1988
DOI: 10.1007/bf01410203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Shafarevich-Tate group of the jacobian of a quotient of the Fermat curve

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One can prove this in a quite similar way to [10,Theorem 1.4]. See also [2] and [7], where the case n = 5 is treated.…”
Section: The Cassels-tate Pairingsupporting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One can prove this in a quite similar way to [10,Theorem 1.4]. See also [2] and [7], where the case n = 5 is treated.…”
Section: The Cassels-tate Pairingsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…We begin with a theorem proved by McCallum [10], which is fundamental in our calculation. It enables us to describe the Cassels-Tate pairing , ψ defined in (2) in terms of the Hilbert norm residue symbol…”
Section: The Cassels-tate Pairingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For that reason, these tend to be somewhat unwieldy to implement. Other algorithms use functions on the curve to compute a Selmer group ( [BK,Ca,CF,Fd,FPS,KS,Mc,PS,Sc1,Tp]). These tend to be far easier.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It remains an open problem whether the inequality rk(J p,r (Q)) ≤ 2 holds in general. One possible approach is to perform a (ζ − 1)-descent on J p,r using its isogeny decomposition over K combined with results of Faddeev ([6]) and McCallum ( [15]). For some time, the author was under the impression that the information on the corresponding Selmer and Shafarevich-Tate groups obtained by this approach produces examples where the inequality rk(J p,r (Q)) ≤ 2 fails.…”
Section: Proposition 21 Let M Be Any Number Field Thenmentioning
confidence: 99%