2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00220-014-1947-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Second Mixed Moment of the Characteristic Polynomials of 1D Band Matrices

Abstract: We consider the asymptotic behavior of the second mixed moment of the characteristic polynomials of 1D Gaussian band matrices, i.e. of the Hermitian N × N matrices H N with independent Gaussian entries such that H ij H lk = δ ik δ jl J ij , where J = (−W 2 △ + 1) −1 . Assuming that W 2 = N 1+θ , 0 < θ ≤ 1, we show that the moment's asymptotic behavior (as N → ∞) in the bulk of the spectrum coincides with that for the Gaussian Unitary Ensemble.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
57
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Assuming that the band width W ≪ √ n, we prove that the limit of the normalized second mixed moment of characteristic polynomials (as W, n → ∞) is equal to one, and so it does not coincides with those for GUE. This complements the result of [18] and proves the expected crossover for 1D Hermitian random band matrices at W ∼ √ n on the level of characteristic polynomials. …”
supporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Assuming that the band width W ≪ √ n, we prove that the limit of the normalized second mixed moment of characteristic polynomials (as W, n → ∞) is equal to one, and so it does not coincides with those for GUE. This complements the result of [18] and proves the expected crossover for 1D Hermitian random band matrices at W ∼ √ n on the level of characteristic polynomials. …”
supporting
confidence: 85%
“…Moreover, correlation functions of characteristic polynomials are expected to exhibit a crossover which is similar to that of local eigenvalue statistics. In particular, for 1D RBM they are expected to have the same local behaviour as for GUE for W ≫ √ n, and the different behaviour for W ≪ √ n. The first part of this conjecture was proved in [18]. The main result of [18] is Theorem 1.1 ( [18]) For the 1D RBM of (1.1) -(1.2) with W 2 = n 1+θ , where 0 < θ ≤ 1, we have 6) i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Till now this result is not proven rigorously, but the problem is one of the most challenging in the random matrix theory (see, e.g. [19], [3], [4], [18] and references therein).…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Localization has been shown for M N 1/8 in [23], while delocalization in a certain weak sense for the most eigenvectors was proven for M N 4/5 in [11]. Interestingly, for a special Gaussian model even the sine kernel behavior of the 2-point correlation function of the characteristic polynomials could be proven down to the optimal band width M N 1/2 , see [19,21]. Note that the sine kernel is consistent with the delocalization but does not imply it.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Second, we assume that the distribution of the matrix elements matches a Gaussian up to four moments in the spirit of [28]. Supersymmetry heavily uses Gaussian integrations, in fact all mathematically rigorous works on random band matrices with supersymmetric method assume that the matrix elements are Gaussian, see [4][5][6][19][20][21]26,27]. The Green's function comparison method [14] allows one to compare Green's functions of two matrix ensembles provided that the distributions match up to four moments and provided that G ii are bounded.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%