2023
DOI: 10.1007/s00009-023-02272-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Second Hankel Determinant of Logarithmic Coefficients for Certain Univalent Functions

Abstract: where Γ 1 , Γ 2 , and Γ 3 are the first, second and third logarithmic coefficients of inverse functions belonging to the class S of normalized univalent functions. In this article, we establish sharp inequalitiesfor the logarithmic coefficients of inverse functions, considering starlike and convex functions, as well as functions with bounded turning of order 1/2, respectively.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…for starlike and convex functions with respect to symmetric points in the open unit disk U was considered by Allu and Arora [23].…”
Section: Second Hankel Determinant Of the Logarithmic Coefficients 481mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…for starlike and convex functions with respect to symmetric points in the open unit disk U was considered by Allu and Arora [23].…”
Section: Second Hankel Determinant Of the Logarithmic Coefficients 481mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Very recently, Kowalczyk and Lecko [20] examined the sharp bounds of |H 2,1 (F f /2)| for the classes of strongly starlike and strongly convex functions. Allu et al [3] (see also [34]) examined the sharp bounds of |H 2,1 (F f /2)| for the classes of starlike and convex functions with respect to symmetric points. Moreover, the sharp bounds of |H 2,1 (F f /2)| for the class of starlike functions of order α (0 ≤ α < 1) with respect to symmetric points were investigated in [33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For σ = 0 the result of the Corollary 1 becomes Theorem 2.2 from [1]. Setting in Theorem 1 the function…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Further, due to the significance of the recent studies about the logarithmic coefficients, the problem obtaining the sharp bounds for the second Hankel determinant of these coefficients, that is H 2,1 (F f /2) was reported in the papers [1,8,9] for several subfamilies of analytic functions, where the second Hankel determinant for F f /2, by utilizing the relations (3), will be…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%