2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10898-019-00853-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the search of the shape parameter in radial basis functions using univariate global optimization methods

Abstract: In this paper we consider the problem of finding an optimal value of the shape parameter in radial basis function interpolation. In particular, we propose the use of a leave-one-out cross validation (LOOCV) technique combined with univariate global optimization methods, which involve strategies of Global Optimization with Pessimistic Improvement (GOPI) and Global Optimization with Optimistic Improvement (GOOI). This choice is carried out to overcome serious issues of commonly used optimization routines that so… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They considered boundary data (as known solution) to mimic the actual error trend for selection of MQ shape parameter. One can also use the LOOCV (leave-oneout cross validation) algorithm and its modified versions for shape parameter selection, see Cavoretto et al (2019) for a detail discussion.…”
Section: Computational Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They considered boundary data (as known solution) to mimic the actual error trend for selection of MQ shape parameter. One can also use the LOOCV (leave-oneout cross validation) algorithm and its modified versions for shape parameter selection, see Cavoretto et al (2019) for a detail discussion.…”
Section: Computational Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is emphasized that the shape parameter c plays a vital role in controlling accuracy and stability. For relevant discussion on this aspect, see (Fasshauer 2007;Sarra and Kansa 2009;Fasshauer and McCourt 2015;Haq 2020a, 2019;Cavoretto et al 2019). In Table 1, note that the globally supported RBFs Sn and TPS RBFs belong to continuous functions class C 2n−1 .…”
Section: Hrbf Approximation Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The linear system (5) has therefore a unique solution and provides a unique GBF approximation x * . For a vanishing regularization parameter γ → 0, the limit x • = lim γ →0 x * is uniquely determined by the condition (4) and the unique coefficients calculated in (5) with γ = 0. The resulting signal x • interpolates the data (w i , x(w i )), i.e.…”
Section: Positive Definite Gbfs For Signal Approximation On Graphsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig 5. RRMSEs and CPU times (in seconds) obtained for the GBF-PUM (with J = 8 and r = 8) and the global GBF scheme in terms of N interpolation nodes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this may deceive one and gives a local minima instead of global one. This drawback has been recently dealt using global optimization tools [25]. Further investigations of Fasshaeur modification were carried out by Uddin [26] in solution of time‐dependent PDEs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%