1981
DOI: 10.1016/0370-2693(81)90886-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the scope of supersymmetric dimensional regularization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
77
0
1

Year Published

1983
1983
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
77
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, our opinion is that even if some tricks were devised to avoid the ambiguities known to be present in the NDR and DRED schemes [37], the approach we propose would be neverteless simpler thanks to the unified treatment of the evanescent and relevant operators.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, our opinion is that even if some tricks were devised to avoid the ambiguities known to be present in the NDR and DRED schemes [37], the approach we propose would be neverteless simpler thanks to the unified treatment of the evanescent and relevant operators.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This regularization is mathematically consistent unlike the dimensional reduction [24]. (Removing the inconsistencies of the dimensional reduction leads to the loss of the explicit supersymmetry [25], which can be in this case broken by higher order quantum corrections [26][27][28].) The higher covariant derivative regularization can be formulated in the explicitly N = 1 supersymmetric way [29,30], so that it does not break supersymmetry.…”
Section: Jhep05(2016)014mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is well known that DRED is not mathematically consistent [20]. Its inconsistency leads to the loss of explicit SUSY [21], which will be broken by quantum corrections in higher loops [22,23]. Nevertheless, a recent analytical calculation [24] demonstrates that the DRED regularization and the DR scheme are working in the N = 4 SYM theory up to the four-loop approximation and give the vanishing result for its β-function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%