2014
DOI: 10.1007/s13280-014-0548-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the scope and management of pesticide pollution of Swedish groundwater resources: The Scanian example

Abstract: Twenty-three south-Swedish public supply wells were studied to assess pesticide pollution of regional groundwater resources. Relations between pesticide occurrence, hydrogeology, and land use were analyzed using Kohonen's Self-Organizing Maps approach. Pesticides are demonstrated to be substantially present in regional groundwater, with detections in 18 wells. Concentrations above the drinking water threshold are confirmed for nine wells. Observations indicate considerable urban influence, and lagged effects o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The PFAS problem and the shortcomings when it comes to groundwater quality monitoring are exemplary for the general monitoring situation in Sweden, which was criticized by the EU commission (European Commission 2012 ) and that urgently should be improved. As stated above, there are too many authorities partly responsible for monitoring today and coordination is highly insufficient (Åkesson et al 2015 ; Augustsson et al 2016 ). One single authority should be designated to have the overall responsibility for water monitoring, which was also suggested by a recent governmental report (Regeringskansliet 2016 ).…”
Section: Current Developments and Future Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PFAS problem and the shortcomings when it comes to groundwater quality monitoring are exemplary for the general monitoring situation in Sweden, which was criticized by the EU commission (European Commission 2012 ) and that urgently should be improved. As stated above, there are too many authorities partly responsible for monitoring today and coordination is highly insufficient (Åkesson et al 2015 ; Augustsson et al 2016 ). One single authority should be designated to have the overall responsibility for water monitoring, which was also suggested by a recent governmental report (Regeringskansliet 2016 ).…”
Section: Current Developments and Future Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, if nitrate pollution in drinking water is caused by nitrate released from legacy stores in the subsurface, or leaking septic tanks close to wells, and subsequently carried downstream, then managing nitrate inputs upstream will not alleviate the problem (Destouni et al 2010;Å kesson et al 2014). However, focusing on key local fluxes affected by an intervention program ensures that, at the very least, broadscale effectiveness of the program can be assessed.…”
Section: Challenges and Opportunitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2020). There are two main factors affecting the occurrence of FA otoliths in fish: genetic factors and environmental pressure factors (Bengtsson & Hindberg, 1985; Jawad et al ., 2012b; Newman & Clements, 2008). These data also provided a good basis on which to analyse the FA changes of C. lucidus otoliths in different body lengths (corresponding to genetic factors and natural selection) and functional areas (corresponding to different environmental changes), as well as genetic differences between sites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%