2019
DOI: 10.1080/10586458.2018.1537866
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Saturation Conjecture for Spin(2n)

Abstract: In this paper we examine the saturation conjecture on decompositions of tensor products of irreducible representations for complex semisimple algebraic groups of type D (the even spin groups: Spinp2nq for n ě 4 an integer), extending work done by Kumar-Kapovich-Millson on Spin(8). Our main theorem asserts that the saturation conjecture holds for Spin(10) and Spin (12): for all triples of dominants weights λ, µ, ν such that λ`µ`ν is in the root lattice, and for any N ą 0,. Some related results for groups of oth… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(41 reference statements)
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here µ = a 1 ω 1 + a 2 ω 2 and µ = b 1 ω 1 + b 2 ω 2 + b 3 ω 3 are arbitrary dominant weights. The cohomology calculations were performed using Sage [29] using a modification of the main algorithm in [19]. These results agree with those of [23, §8.8], although they write their inequalities in a different basis.…”
Section: Case N =supporting
confidence: 64%
“…Here µ = a 1 ω 1 + a 2 ω 2 and µ = b 1 ω 1 + b 2 ω 2 + b 3 ω 3 are arbitrary dominant weights. The cohomology calculations were performed using Sage [29] using a modification of the main algorithm in [19]. These results agree with those of [23, §8.8], although they write their inequalities in a different basis.…”
Section: Case N =supporting
confidence: 64%
“…There are examples in type A in [Bel17], due to Derksen-Weyman [DW11, Example 7.13] and Ressayre, of extremal rays for SLp8q and SLp9q respectively, which do not have this property, and give examples of extremal rays which are not type I on any face. There are similar examples which do not have this property for D 5 in [Kie18].…”
Section: Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…does hold; this is because the Hermitian eigenvalue cones for H ∨ and H are isomorphic, as are those for G ∨ and G, see [KLM03, Theorem 1.8], and there is a map between the Hermitian eigenvalue cones for H and G since there is a compatible mapping of maximal compact subgroups, see [BK10]. Therefore implication (5.1) always holds when G is of type Kie19] by saturation. Here we note that Gr G,c( λ ′ ) = ∅ implies that λ ′ i is in the coroot lattice for G which equals the root lattice of G ∨ .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%