2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2010.09.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Roles of Substrate Binding and Hinge Unfolding in Conformational Changes of Adenylate Kinase

Abstract: We characterized the conformational change of adenylate kinase (AK) between open and closed forms by conducting five all-atom molecular-dynamics simulations, each of 100 ns duration. Different initial structures and substrate binding configurations were used to probe the pathways of AK conformational change in explicit solvent, and no bias potential was applied. A complete closed-to-open and a partial open-to-closed transition were observed, demonstrating the direct impact of substrate-mediated interactions on… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
64
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
10
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our simulations, cracking was indeed observed in the vicinity of the hinge region linking the N and C lobes; this led to highly extended conformations, which the kinase visited while interconverting between its active and Srclike inactive conformations. These simulations are among the few examples thus far of spontaneous cracking being directly observed in unbiased atomistic simulations (22). Importantly, the simulations suggest that a protein may need to significantly deviate from its relatively compact native-like conformation in the process of a conformational change.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our simulations, cracking was indeed observed in the vicinity of the hinge region linking the N and C lobes; this led to highly extended conformations, which the kinase visited while interconverting between its active and Srclike inactive conformations. These simulations are among the few examples thus far of spontaneous cracking being directly observed in unbiased atomistic simulations (22). Importantly, the simulations suggest that a protein may need to significantly deviate from its relatively compact native-like conformation in the process of a conformational change.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…They argued that cracking may lower the freeenergy barrier of the conformational change and that the entropic gain resulting from the greater number of accessible conformations may overcome the enthalpic loss due to the disruption of favorable contacts that results from unfolding. Various models were subsequently developed to demonstrate the cracking mechanism (20,21), but cracking has only rarely been observed in fully atomistic simulations of protein conformational changes without using artificial biasing forces (22).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, four studies find the free energy of the open state to be lower than the closed state for unligated AdK [24,61,66,74] with several others indirectly supporting this result, having found their simulations to have a preference for the open confor-mation. [8,23,72] Across all studies, there are large discrepancies in the estimated free energy differences between the two states, and at present the source of the discrepancy is not obvious.…”
Section: Conformational Equilibrium Between Open and Closed Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other order parameter pairs to characterize 2D motions include the RMSD to/from the final and/or initial structure(s) [23,59,61,62], essential variables from PCA or NMA [8,23,43,65,69,70], and fractions of native contacts relative to the initial and final structures [16,59]. Lou and Cukier [71], Brokaw and Chu [72], and Pontiggia et al [73] all measure NMP-CORE separation with the distance between residues 55 and 169, but each, respectively, monitor LID-CORE variation differently: LID-CORE mass-center distance [71], C α distance between residues 127 and 194 [72], and LID-CORE angle [73]. Progress along one dimension (e.g., plotting the potential of mean force) was captured using domain mass-center distances [24,58,69,74], RMSD to and/or from crystal structures [15,61,67,75], and indices or distances along a computed reaction coordinate pathway [24,47,48,66,76,77].…”
Section: Collective Variables Describing the Adk Transitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation