2009
DOI: 10.1090/s0002-9939-09-10115-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the role of the collection principle for Σ⁰₂-formulas in second-order reverse mathematics

Abstract: Our proof uses the notion of a bi-tame cut, the existence of which we show to be equivalent, over RCA 0 , to the failure of BΣ 0 2 .

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…D n k : "For every ∆ 0 n k-partition of ω, there is an infinite subset of one of the parts". Cholak, Jockusch and Slaman [3], Mileti [21] and Chong, Lempp and Yang [4], proved that RT 2 2 is equivalent to COH ∧D 2 2 . The interest of such a decomposition comes from the combinatorial simplicity of COH and D 2 2 .…”
Section: Cohesiveness and The Pigeonhole Principlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…D n k : "For every ∆ 0 n k-partition of ω, there is an infinite subset of one of the parts". Cholak, Jockusch and Slaman [3], Mileti [21] and Chong, Lempp and Yang [4], proved that RT 2 2 is equivalent to COH ∧D 2 2 . The interest of such a decomposition comes from the combinatorial simplicity of COH and D 2 2 .…”
Section: Cohesiveness and The Pigeonhole Principlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of course, d is not computable from c, merely from the Turing jump of c. Thus, while SRT 2 k is not computably reducible to RT 1 k , it is computably equivalent to a kind of ∆ 0 2 version of RT 1 k called D 2 k , which we will not discuss here. (See [6] and [9, Section 3] for thorough explorations of how these principles are related. )…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More generally, we do not know if there is any set X, and any stable coloring of pairs d computable from X, such that for every infinite homogeneous set H for d, X ⊕ H has p-cohesive degree relative to X. Corollary 1. 6 shows that the answer is no if we ask for H itself, rather than X ⊕ H, to have p-cohesive degree relative to X.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence such a condition does not impose additional assumption to the base theory. See Chong, Lempp, and Yang (2010). model would not satisfy RT 2 2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%