2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2004.09.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the role of the transformation eigenstrain in the growth or shrinkage of spheroidal isotropic precipitations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to a detailed study reported by Bo¨hm et al (1997) and Fischer and Bo¨hm (2005), U v can be written as…”
Section: The Evaluation Of the Correspondence Strain Energy U Vmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to a detailed study reported by Bo¨hm et al (1997) and Fischer and Bo¨hm (2005), U v can be written as…”
Section: The Evaluation Of the Correspondence Strain Energy U Vmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analytical models and their applications presented in [20][21][22][23] describes the disturbance of an existing applied-stress field to be uniform in the infinity in contrast to the Mizutani's and Ceniga's analytical cell models [17,37]. The cell models resulting from a differential approach describe a thermal-stress field not to exist in the absence of the inclusion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Analytical models of elastic stresses, including the thermal stresses, in an inclusion (=precipitate)-matrix system are usually determined using Eshelby's and Mori-Tanaka concepts [20][21][22][23]. The concepts result from mathematical techniques belonging more or less to Theoretical Physics represented by an integration approach to use the Green's functions, ordinary Newtonian potential and biharmonic potential [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three main approaches to model transformation toughening have been used. One is an Eshelby-type approach (e. g. McMeeking and Evans, 1982;Yang and Zhu, 1998;Yi and Gao, 2000;Yi et al, 2001;Li and Yang, 2002;Fischer and Boehm, 2005). Another is the finite element method (FEM), (e.g., Zeng et al, 1999Zeng et al, , 2004Vena et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%