2022
DOI: 10.1109/jstars.2022.3162641
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Role of Polarimetric Decomposition and Speckle Filtering Methods for C-Band SAR Wetland Classification Purposes

Abstract: Previous wetlands studies have thoroughly verified the usefulness of data from synthetic aperture radar (SAR) sensors in various acquisition modes. However, the effect of the processing parameters in wetland classification remains poorly explored. In this study, we investigated the influence of speckle filters and decomposition methods with different combinations of filter and decomposition windows sizes on classification accuracy. We used a C-band Radarsat 2 image acquired over a wetland located in northeast … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, despite more polarimetric information being provided by quad-pol than dual-pol SAR images, the SI g of Hansbreen and Hornbreen was not recognized as a separate class by any of the methods in this study, or by using different SAR band lengths. This can be due to (1) the thin layer of SI g [25], which does not have a large influence on overall SAR reflectance in either C-or L-band; (2) low representation, or poor separation, of data representing the local SI g , so it is not recognized by the GMM-EM algorithm [81]; or (3) too strong a speckle filtering algorithm [82,83], so that the local SI g is averaged with other zones.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, despite more polarimetric information being provided by quad-pol than dual-pol SAR images, the SI g of Hansbreen and Hornbreen was not recognized as a separate class by any of the methods in this study, or by using different SAR band lengths. This can be due to (1) the thin layer of SI g [25], which does not have a large influence on overall SAR reflectance in either C-or L-band; (2) low representation, or poor separation, of data representing the local SI g , so it is not recognized by the GMM-EM algorithm [81]; or (3) too strong a speckle filtering algorithm [82,83], so that the local SI g is averaged with other zones.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SAR imaging system introduces the speckle noise of SAR images. Unlike the widely-studied additive noise in optical images, it belongs to multiplicative noise, a large proportion of which is of high-frequency [12]- [14], [50]- [52]. To prove the effectiveness of target recognition of the suggested method for speckle noise SAR images, we began with speckle noise modeling referring to the literature [11] for the generation of SAR images with various degrees of speckle noise.…”
Section: A Speckle Noise Data Augmentation Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The polarization scattering feature is used to represent the original SAR data, including matrix elements, polarization decomposition, and backscattering features (Table 4). They are designed to reflect the different geometric and dielectric properties of ground objects [39][40][41][42]. The H-A-α decomposition method proposed by Cloude and Pottier is used to extract the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of dual-polarization (DP) SAR data by covari-ance matrix [C] Equation (8).…”
Section: Polarimetric Scattering Featurementioning
confidence: 99%