2008
DOI: 10.1080/08959280802347122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Role of Goal Orientation Traits and Self-Efficacy in the Goal-Setting Process: Distinctions That Make a Difference

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
1
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
1
17
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Goal setting is known to influence attention, persistence, and application of knowledge in relation to the performance of tasks, which may in turn influence performance (Locke & Latham, 2002). Additionally, when goals are highly meaningful to clients (Fan, Meng, Billings, Litchfield, & Kaplan, 2008), the intervention effects of goal setting are heightened. Further exploration of the effect of goal setting within OPC is warranted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Goal setting is known to influence attention, persistence, and application of knowledge in relation to the performance of tasks, which may in turn influence performance (Locke & Latham, 2002). Additionally, when goals are highly meaningful to clients (Fan, Meng, Billings, Litchfield, & Kaplan, 2008), the intervention effects of goal setting are heightened. Further exploration of the effect of goal setting within OPC is warranted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, some researchers (e.g. Fan, Meng, Billings, Litchfield, & Kaplan, 2008;Phan, 2009) assume goals as predictors of self-efficacy.…”
Section: Self-efficacy and Task Valuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research that has incorporated distal traits into motivational models of performance have similarly focused on expectancies and efficacy beliefs as important mediating variables (Fan, Meng, Billings, Litchfield, & Kaplan, 2008;Klein & Lee, 2006). Unfortunately, this research has focused primarily on traits related to conscientiousness because it is constructed as most relevant to motivation (generally defined by effort), providing little guidance for developing theories or practical interventions when other traits may be related to domain-specific expectations.…”
Section: Personality and Domain-specific Expectanciesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For instance, Locke (2001) presents a 'mediationlinking model' in which motivating variables, such as personality traits, influence intermediary variables such as self-efficacy and goal commitment, which in turn directly influence task performance. Research that has incorporated distal traits into motivational models of performance have similarly focused on expectancies and efficacy beliefs as important mediating variables (Fan, Meng, Billings, Litchfield, & Kaplan, 2008;Klein & Lee, 2006).…”
Section: Personality and Domain-specific Expectanciesmentioning
confidence: 99%