Proceedings of the 23rd International Symposium on Wearable Computers 2019
DOI: 10.1145/3341163.3347727
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the role of features in human activity recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
56
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To evaluate our approach, we consider 7 of the most widely recognized datasets in HAR [28], comparing for each dataset the performance of our method against the methods in the literature that we found have achieved highest performance. We provide the comparison with respect to at most 5 other approaches with best performance in the literature for each dataset.…”
Section: Evaluation Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate our approach, we consider 7 of the most widely recognized datasets in HAR [28], comparing for each dataset the performance of our method against the methods in the literature that we found have achieved highest performance. We provide the comparison with respect to at most 5 other approaches with best performance in the literature for each dataset.…”
Section: Evaluation Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plötz et al [6] demonstrated that feature learning using deep belief networks (DBN) can lead to significantly improved and especially generalized classification performance downstream when compared to hand-crafted features. Other variants of feature learning utilized more contemporary forms of autoencoder networks showing similar improvements in feature generalization capabilities [23,24].…”
Section: Feature Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relaxing the requirements on annotations even further, one could explore to what extent virtual IMU data can be used for fully unsupervised learning scenarios where, for examples, feature representations are learned directly from raw sensor data [6,24].…”
Section: Virtual Imu Data As Basis For Alternatives To Supervised Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [22] determining the optimal window length for each of the activities of interest in a given task shows substantially improved performance over using a standard window length across all activities. As shown in [16], feature engineering is an important aspect of learning representations that can be used to separate data belonging to different activity classes. Signal based statistical features were succeeded by more sophisticated feature extraction techniques such as in the case of ECDF features [14].…”
Section: Task Complexity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%