1989
DOI: 10.1159/000125210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Role of Brain Mineralocorticoid (Type I) and Glucocorticoid (Type II) Receptors in Neuroendocrine Regulation

Abstract: Administrations of the glucocorticoid receptor antagonist (anti-glucocorticoid, RU38486) and the mineralocorticoid antagonist (anti-mineralocorticoid, RU28318) followed by frequent, sequential blood sampling were employed to investigate the possible role the brain mineralocorticoid receptor (MR, type I) and glucocorticoid receptor (GR, type II) have in the regulation of basal and stress-induced adrenocortical secretion in the rat. The anti-mineralocorticoid and anti-glucocorticoid were administered subcutaneou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

21
228
4
2

Year Published

1994
1994
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 474 publications
(257 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
21
228
4
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the reduction in immobility was less robust than reported earlier (probably due to use of another route of administration) (De Kloet et al, 1988), the difference was highly significant. One should keep in mind that, following systemic RU38486 treatment, disinhibition of the pituitaryadrenal system occurs which leads to a rise in circulating corticosterone (Ratka et al, 1989), These higher corticosterone levels may interact with the action of the glucocorticoid receptor antagonist in the brain. Furthermore it must be noted that the immobility scores in the present study reached higher values than in the above-mentioned studies (Jefferys et al, 1983;De Kloet et al, 1988).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the reduction in immobility was less robust than reported earlier (probably due to use of another route of administration) (De Kloet et al, 1988), the difference was highly significant. One should keep in mind that, following systemic RU38486 treatment, disinhibition of the pituitaryadrenal system occurs which leads to a rise in circulating corticosterone (Ratka et al, 1989), These higher corticosterone levels may interact with the action of the glucocorticoid receptor antagonist in the brain. Furthermore it must be noted that the immobility scores in the present study reached higher values than in the above-mentioned studies (Jefferys et al, 1983;De Kloet et al, 1988).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three days before the experiment at 09:30 h, rats were bilaterally adrenalectomized (n ϭ 12) or sham operated (n ϭ 14) under halothane (Sanofi Sante, Maassluis, The Netherlands) anesthesia as described earlier (Ratka et al 1989). In a second series of experiments, ADX rats (n ϭ 8) received a subcutaneous 25-mg corticosterone pellet (Innovative Research of America), which is known to result in moderately high circulating levels of corticosterone (Ratka et al 1989). Control ADX rats (n ϭ 4) received a placebo pellet.…”
Section: Surgery and Slice Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, type I sites, possibly CORT-selective, are also found in the brain, with highest concentrations in the limbic system and low-tomoderate concentrations in the hypothalamus, pituitary, and cortex (2,5,8,47,83). This receptor subtype is up-regulated after ADX, and it is down-regulated by CORT or ALDO administration (8,38,39,(84)(85)(86)(87), reflecting the involvement of this type I receptor in feedback requirements during periods of low circulating steroids (86,88,89).…”
Section: Adrenal Steroids and Their Receptorsmentioning
confidence: 99%