On the right way to crack nuts and farm fruit

Mercado, Eduardo

doi:10.1016/j.plrev.2022.12.021

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 29 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…An alternative explanation is that individuals attend to others’ actions, and then reinnovate a “latent solution” to produce similar outcomes [ 5 ]. Alternatively, apparent innovations could have previously been unobserved or learned not socially but in response to changing environments [ 31 ]. It is hotly debated whether these alternatives are valid and relevant; see [ 32 ] and the numerous responses for an overview of current opinions.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cumulative route improvements spontaneously emerge in artificial navigators even in the absence of sophisticated communication or thought

Dalmaijer

2024

PLoS Biol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Homing pigeons (Columba livia) navigate by solar and magnetic compass, and fly home in idiosyncratic but stable routes when repeatedly released from the same location. However, when experienced pigeons fly alongside naive counterparts, their path is altered. Over several generations of turnover (pairs in which the most experienced individual is replaced with a naive one), pigeons show cumulative improvements in efficiency. Here, I show that such cumulative route improvements can occur in a much simpler system by using agent-based simulation. Artificial agents are in silico entities that navigate with a minimal cognitive architecture of goal-direction (they know roughly where the goal is), social proximity (they seek proximity to others and align headings), route memory (they recall landmarks with increasing precision), and continuity (they avoid erratic turns). Agents’ behaviour qualitatively matched that of pigeons, and quantitatively fitted to pigeon data. My results indicate that naive agents benefitted from being paired with experienced agents by following their previously established route. Importantly, experienced agents also benefitted from being paired with naive agents due to regression to the goal: naive agents were more likely to err towards the goal from the perspective of experienced agents’ memorised paths. This subtly biased pairs in the goal direction, resulting in intergenerational improvements of route efficiency. No cumulative improvements were evident in control studies in which agents’ goal-direction, social proximity, or memory were lesioned. These 3 factors are thus necessary and sufficient for cumulative route improvements to emerge, even in the absence of sophisticated communication or thought.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%