On the right path? Exploring the experiences and opinions of clinicians involved in developing and implementing HealthPathways Barwon

Abstract

Abstract. The aims of this paper are to present the findings of a process evaluation exploring the experiences and opinions of clinicians who have been involved in the HealthPathways Barwon clinical workgroups and discuss implications for further development of the program, as well as regional health service initiatives more broadly. HealthPathways Barwon is a webbased program comprising locally agreed-upon evidence-based clinical pathways that assist with assessment, management and region-specific referral for various clinical conditions. Clinical workgroup members participated in focus groups. Coding and thematic analysis were performed and findings were compared with similar evaluations of HealthPathways in other jurisdictions. Five broad themes emerged from the focus group, each with several subthemes: (1) purpose of HealthPathways; (2) workgroup process; (3) barriers and facilitators to HealthPathways use; (4) impact of HealthPathways on clinical practice; and (5) measuring performance. Findings of particular interest were that the perceived drivers for implementation of HealthPathways Barwon are broad, HealthPathways Barwon is viewed positively by clinicians, the workgroup process itself has a positive impact on relationships between primary and secondary care clinicians, existing habits of clinicians are a major barrier to adoption of HealthPathways Barwon, the sustainability of HealthPathways Barwon is a concern and it is difficult to measure the outcomes of HealthPathways. Although HealthPathways Barwon is viewed positively by clinicians and is seen to have the potential to address many issues at the primary-secondary care interface, successful implementation and uptake will depend on buy-in from clinicians, as well as continuous evaluation to inform improved development and implementation. More broadly, health service initiatives like HealthPathways Barwon require longer-term certainty of funding and administration to become established and produce meaningful outcomes. What is known about this topic?HealthPathways is a program that has been implemented in Canterbury, New Zealand, and several regions in Australia. Early evaluations in these jurisdictions have found that measuring the impact of the program is challenging, and there is little evidence of the program's influence on health system performance indicators such as waiting times. However they have found some evidence of improved collaboration between primary and secondary care clinicians and improved clinician experience in providing patient care. What does the paper add? This case study outlines a potential method of evaluation of HealthPathways, as well as some early evidence regarding the experiences of those developing, implementing and using the program in the Barwon region in South-West Victoria. What are the implications for practitioners? HealthPathways Barwon may impact positively on clinician-clinician relationships and confidence, however getting more clinicians to use the program may require identification of ways to better incorpora...

Local clinical pathways: from ‘good ideas’ to ‘practicality’ for general practitioners

“…1 Clinical pathways can simplify navigating a health system and lead to less fragmentation and greater collaboration between primary and secondary care. 2 in both New Zealand (NZ) 3 and australia, 4 clinical pathways have been widely adopted as a way to provide localised evidence-based clinical practice and referral, notably through the Canterbury HealthPathways initiative, which is now widely used in both countries. 3 There is, however, limited evaluation of their effectiveness in improving clinical care [5][6][7] and in assessing the barriers and facilitators 8 to their use by general practitioners (GPs).…”

An online resource supporting refugee healthcare in Australian general practice: An exploratory study

“…26 Additional similarities were that GPs primarily use HealthPathways for information on clinical conditions and referral pathways, with some using it for the links to patient education resources; 26 when the information on the website confirms their existing knowledge and practice, it gives GPs confidence. 27 As participants in our study noted, existing habits and user familiarity with a resource are likely to affect whether GPs will use it. This is in line with both the HealthPathways literature and other studies describing GP use of clinical practice guidelines.…”

“…[25][26][27][28] HealthPathways is a web-based program containing locally agreed-upon, evidencebased clinical pathways that aim to support health practitioners with the assessment and management of patients with various clinical conditions. 27 It was developed in New Zealand and has been adopted by several Primary Health Networks in Australia. Interestingly, the results of our evaluation reflect much of what has been documented in the HealthPathways literature.…”

“…This is in line with both the HealthPathways literature and other studies describing GP use of clinical practice guidelines. 27,29,30 Clearly publicising the Australian Refugee Health Practice Guide website and educating GPs so they are familiar with it will therefore be crucial to its future uptake.…”

A cross-cutting approach to enhancing clinical trial site success: The Department of Veterans Affairs' Network of Dedicated Enrollment Sites (NODES) model

“…A practice widely used across a number of disciplines by key stakeholders is the establishment of working groups, or “workgroups” to create solutions to important issues [9] , [10] , [11] , [12] . These workgroups include key stakeholders from multidisciplinary areas of CSP research such as biostatisticians, program directors, safety and quality assurance managers, data and informatics managers, and study managers and they provide expertise and insights in resolving critical issues.…”