Recently accumulated data suggest that the transcription of an individual cistron into a ribopolynucleotide and its subsequent translation into a polypeptide are ordered and oriented processes. Thus, the ingenious genetic experiments of Crick et al.1 and Champe and Benzer2 are readily interpretable if the reading of the base sequence starts from a fixed point and continues until the end of the cistron is indicated. Further, the elegant analysis of haemoglobin synthesis by Dintzis3 implies that the growth of a polypeptide chain is the result of a sequential addition of residues starting at the NH2-terminal amino acid and finishing at the free carboxyl end.Since every cistron is presumed to have its own beginning, each can, in principle, be read independently of the others. The experiments cited do not, therefore, provide an answer to the following question: Is the transcription of the genome random or nonrandom? By "random" we mean that the probability of transcription for any particular cistron is invariant with time and independent of its location in the genome.The fact that specific proteins appear sequentially in phage-infected bacteria4-7 does not answer the question since one can have an ordered use of randomly produced genetic messages.An approach toward the solution of the problem may be seen by recognizing that if the reading is random, then any sample of RNA messages is equivalent to any other. If it is not random, a sample taken at one time should be distinguishable from that taken at another. To decide between these alternatives, three experimental conditions are required. One is a situation synchronized with respect to the onset in the transcription of a known genome. A second is the suppression of possible selective degradation of particular messages due to use in protein synthesis.