2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2015.12.069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On The Restricted Size Ramsey Number

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The size Ramsey number for a pair of graphs was introduced by Erdős et al in 1978 [4], while the restricted size Ramsey number for a pair of graphs is a direct consequence of the concept of Ramsey and size Ramsey number in graphs. Some previous results on the (restricted) size Ramsey number of graphs was given in [1,5] and the previous results on the restricted size Ramsey number involving a P 3 can be found in [9,10,11,12,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The size Ramsey number for a pair of graphs was introduced by Erdős et al in 1978 [4], while the restricted size Ramsey number for a pair of graphs is a direct consequence of the concept of Ramsey and size Ramsey number in graphs. Some previous results on the (restricted) size Ramsey number of graphs was given in [1,5] and the previous results on the restricted size Ramsey number involving a P 3 can be found in [9,10,11,12,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In [9] Silaban et al proved that r * (P 3 , C n ) ≤ 2n − 1. In this section we will show that this upper bound can be improved and we prove the following theorem.…”
Section: Upper Bounds For R * (P 3 C N )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…). For all integers n ≥ 4, In 2015, Silaban et al [9] proved the lower and the upper bound for the restricted size Ramsey number for P 3 and cycles. At the end of our article we improve the upper bound for this number.…”
Section: Theorem 2 ([5]mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It had shown that r * (P 3 , C 3 ) = 8, r * (P 3 , C 4 ) = 6, r * (P 3 , C 5 ) = 9. In 2015 Silaban et al proved the last known exact value, namely r * (P 3 , C 6 ) = 9 [8]. In addition, they give lower and upper bound for r * (P 3 , C n ), where n ≥ 8 is even (see below Theorem 3).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%