2023
DOI: 10.1029/2022ms003300
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Resolution Sensitivity of Equatorial Precipitation in a GFDL Global Atmospheric Model

Pu Lin,
Yi Ming,
Thomas Robinson

Abstract: We performed a series of aquaplanet simulations at the horizontal resolution from 50 to 6 km with identical parameterization settings using the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory's Atmosphere Model version 4 implemented with the two‐moment Morrison‐Gettelman cloud microphysics with prognostic precipitation (GFDL AM4‐MG2). At the finer resolution, the global mean resolved‐scale precipitation increases and that from cumulus parameterization decreases. The model also simulates less/thinner clouds over the low … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
(162 reference statements)
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We examine simulations from the NOAA Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory AM4 atmospheric GCM in its alternative "AM4-MG2" configuration, a well-tested configuration that will form the base of future AM models (Guo et al, 2021;Lin et al, 2023). The model employs the standard AM4 physics package (Zhao et al, 2018a;Zhao et al, 2018b), but with more sophisticated microphysics (Gettelman & Morrison, 2015) and a nonhydrostatic solver (Harris et al, 2020).…”
Section: Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We examine simulations from the NOAA Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory AM4 atmospheric GCM in its alternative "AM4-MG2" configuration, a well-tested configuration that will form the base of future AM models (Guo et al, 2021;Lin et al, 2023). The model employs the standard AM4 physics package (Zhao et al, 2018a;Zhao et al, 2018b), but with more sophisticated microphysics (Gettelman & Morrison, 2015) and a nonhydrostatic solver (Harris et al, 2020).…”
Section: Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simulations are configured as an aquaplanet with fixed SSTs specified as the Q-control profile from Neale and Hoskins (2000) and perpetual equinox insolation including a diurnal cycle. Details of the model settings are documented in Lin et al (2023).…”
Section: Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%