1988
DOI: 10.2977/prims/1195175031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the representation of the Picard modular function by $θ$ constants I-II

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0
2

Year Published

1993
1993
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
40
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section we follow a similar approach to that of Matsumoto [20] in a genus 4 problem, who developed earlier results of Shiga [27] and Picard [22]. Write the equation of C in the form…”
Section: Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this section we follow a similar approach to that of Matsumoto [20] in a genus 4 problem, who developed earlier results of Shiga [27] and Picard [22]. Write the equation of C in the form…”
Section: Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a rare event, that a period matrix can be calculated from an algebraic equation, since the two in general are transcendental functions of each other. The method consists in the traditional one [2,26,27] of choosing a suitable homology basis and calculating the covering action on it. We believe our result on the period matrix of the Halphen curve and its reduction to be new.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The modular properties of certain family of curves (1.2) were investigated by Burhardt [6], Hutchinson [19], more recently by Shiga [34] and Koike [26], Diez [7] and others. This curve (1.2) appeared in Zverovich [40] as the curve related to a solvable Riemann-Hilbert problem with quasipermutation monodromy matrices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This formula goes back to Picard [25] and has already been worked out for a special symplectic basis in [30]. But since the period matrices constructed in Section 3 are in general not of a special form, we have to review the arguments in [25,30] and give a more general formulation using geometric considerations.…”
Section: Equation Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%