1995
DOI: 10.1016/0956-7151(95)90170-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the representation of random packings of spheres for sintering simulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The packing fractions observed and modelled are consistent with previous studies which report the "loose" packing fraction for monosized spheres to be between 0.55 and 0.58, depending upon the friction conditions and the limit of random dense packing for monosized spheres, under frictionless conditions, which is 0.64 [14,16,17,26,27]. The effect of a distribution in particle size (in this case a standard deviation of roughly 10%) for the "monosized" case is unlikely to enhance the packing behaviour, with benefits only thought to be likely for deviations greater than 30% [18,27].…”
Section: Overview Of Cast Porous Metal Structuressupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The packing fractions observed and modelled are consistent with previous studies which report the "loose" packing fraction for monosized spheres to be between 0.55 and 0.58, depending upon the friction conditions and the limit of random dense packing for monosized spheres, under frictionless conditions, which is 0.64 [14,16,17,26,27]. The effect of a distribution in particle size (in this case a standard deviation of roughly 10%) for the "monosized" case is unlikely to enhance the packing behaviour, with benefits only thought to be likely for deviations greater than 30% [18,27].…”
Section: Overview Of Cast Porous Metal Structuressupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The effect of a distribution in particle size (in this case a standard deviation of roughly 10%) for the "monosized" case is unlikely to enhance the packing behaviour, with benefits only thought to be likely for deviations greater than 30% [18,27].…”
Section: Overview Of Cast Porous Metal Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different geometric algorithms were developed to generate sphere assemblies for example in cylindrical [29], cubical [16] or conical [18] containers. The well-known ballistic deposition algorithm [1,17,18] consists in adding spheres one by one in a geometrically stable position at the surface of an evenly packed set of spheres. The texture of the packing can be controlled when using this very efficient method [42], but dynamic algorithms show some limitations when producing complex shapes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the author's papers [8][9][10][11][12][13] some chosen random properties of PM material characteristics were discussed, but they do not concern Poisson processes in PM materials. The use of other statistical representations of powders and granular materials are undertaken for instance in [14][15][16]. The main novelty of this paper is to show how point processes can be used to evaluate the powder metallurgy processing and powder metallurgy materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%