1926
DOI: 10.1007/bf02564120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the representation of numbers in the form ax2+by2+cz2+dt2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0
4

Year Published

1998
1998
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 159 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
47
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…To avoid this and at the same to take into account new achievements of modular theory concerning quadratic forms it would be much more natural to separate this question from the circle method. This has really happened, as the example of papers [4] and [5] shows. After Eichler's paper [5] the development of the theory of quadratic forms took a different direction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To avoid this and at the same to take into account new achievements of modular theory concerning quadratic forms it would be much more natural to separate this question from the circle method. This has really happened, as the example of papers [4] and [5] shows. After Eichler's paper [5] the development of the theory of quadratic forms took a different direction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In conclusion let us note that if we compare papers [4] and [5], where one and the same problem is solved by different methods, then we will clearly see the connection between the circle method and modular theory. where The modular point of view explains why the solution of the problem of equalizing Farey's arcs is so complicated and not uniquely defined in the circle method.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For our purpose of establishing some non-trivial Type I and Type II estimates for a given choice of σ (and in particular for σ slightly above 1{6) and for sufficiently small , δ, it is not necessary to have the full square root cancellation in (4.2), and any power savings of the form p 1´c for some fixed c ą 0 would suffice (with the same dependency on P and Q); indeed, one obtains a non-trivial estimate for a given value of σ once one invokes the q-van der Corput method a sufficient number of times, and once the gains from the cancellation are greater than the losses coming from completion of sums, with the latter becoming negligible in the limit , δ Ñ 0. Such a power saving (with c " 1{4) was obtained for the Kloosterman sum (4.3) by Kloosterman [34] using an elementary dilation argument (see also [41] for a generalization), but this argument does not appear to be available for estimates such as (4.4).…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(4.7). The (scalar) Kloosterman sum K c (m, n) [131] is originally defined as 26) wheredd = 1 mod c [129]. This "scalar" Kloosterman sum appears in the expansion when the unitary prefactor is equal to one and the modular vector has length one.…”
Section: A Farey Fractionmentioning
confidence: 99%