2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.orgel.2016.03.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the reliability of determination of energies of HOMO and LUMO levels in organic semiconductors from electrochemical measurements. A simple picture based on the electrostatic model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
75
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 125 publications
2
75
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the ambiguity on the offset between the electrochemical potentials and the estimated FMO energy levels, we only report the raw data of electrochemical potentials in this work. Nevertheless, the trends in the electrochemical potentials can be rationally related to the energy levels of the FMOs , …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the ambiguity on the offset between the electrochemical potentials and the estimated FMO energy levels, we only report the raw data of electrochemical potentials in this work. Nevertheless, the trends in the electrochemical potentials can be rationally related to the energy levels of the FMOs , …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CV technique obtains oxidation/reduction potentials ( E ox /E red , referenced to a redox couple) and these potentials can then be converted to oxidation/reduction energies ( qE ox /qE red ). Studies have shown a linear relationship between UPS IP and CV E ox and IPES EA and CV E red , respectively, such that IP = α + × qE ox + β + and EA = α − × qE red + β − . Despite the general linear relationship, CV and UPS often yield significantly different results in terms of absolute values, and the slope and intercept of the linear relationships obtained by literature vary significantly .…”
Section: Summary Of Vertical Ip Eict+ D–a Interface Potential (δ) Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have shown a linear relationship between UPS IP and CV E ox and IPES EA and CV E red , respectively, such that IP = α + × qE ox + β + and EA = α − × qE red + β − . Despite the general linear relationship, CV and UPS often yield significantly different results in terms of absolute values, and the slope and intercept of the linear relationships obtained by literature vary significantly . For instance, D'Andrade et al reported a slope ( α + ) of 1.4 (i.e., the IP scales at a factor of 1.4 with the E ox ) and an intercept ( β + ) of 4.6 eV, whereas Sworakowski and co‐workers using literature values of IP and E ox found slopes ranging from 0.9 to 1.5 and intercepts from 4.3 to 5.4 eV depending on the type of organic molecule studied, which was attributed to differences in polarization energies/solvation energy going from solid film to (ion‐containing) solution.…”
Section: Summary Of Vertical Ip Eict+ D–a Interface Potential (δ) Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fc/Fc + is one of the redox couples recommended by the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry for reporting energy levels in nonaqueous solvents. [36][37][38][39][40] This would alter the proportionality constant between E CT and (E HOMO,D − E LUMO,A ). [35] Recently, several experimental studies of the oxidation potential as obtained from CV (E ox,CV ) and ionization potential from UPS (IP) have revealed that both quantities are linearly correlated, i.e., IP = α + qE ox,CV + β + , but that the best-fit slope varies considerably from α + = 0.9 to 1.5, depending on the material class.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%