2023
DOI: 10.3389/fmats.2023.1150180
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the relationship of morphology evolution and thermal conductivity of flax reinforced polypropylene laminates

Abstract: This paper focuses on the morphology evolution in the forming process of unidirectional flax reinforced polypropylene composite laminates. The link between the morphology evolution and thermal conductivity during consolidation stages is investigated. Hot press forming allows to manufacture several composite laminates at different consolidation stages as a function of the compaction thickness. Microscopic evolution of the laminates in terms of morphology and porosity fractions are evaluated by scanning electron… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 68 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the literature and to our knowledge, there are no previous studies available in the literature that specifically provide the local thermal conductivity of randomly oriented short flax fibers. However, for well-oriented flax fibers, a study conducted by [ 38 ] provided results of experimental measurements of the thermal conductivity of flax fibers. In the longitudinal direction, the thermal conductivity was 1.232 (W·m −1 ·K −1 ), while in the transverse direction, it was 0.17 (W·m −1 ·K −1 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature and to our knowledge, there are no previous studies available in the literature that specifically provide the local thermal conductivity of randomly oriented short flax fibers. However, for well-oriented flax fibers, a study conducted by [ 38 ] provided results of experimental measurements of the thermal conductivity of flax fibers. In the longitudinal direction, the thermal conductivity was 1.232 (W·m −1 ·K −1 ), while in the transverse direction, it was 0.17 (W·m −1 ·K −1 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%