“…As Jonas et al have pointed out in their paper, 4) it is true that the axes of the Hencky strain and its increment do not coincide during simple shear deformation. It is also true that, in papers published in the 1980s, 10,11) we find the consensus on the inapplicability of the Hencky strain to cases where the principal strain axes rotate during deformation. However, understanding on the Hencky strain has changed in the mid1990s.…”
Section: Rotation Of the Principal Axes Of Strainmentioning
The Hencky strain is a logarithmic strain extended to a three-dimensional analysis. Although Onaka has shown that the Hencky equivalent strain is an appropriate measure of large simple-shear deformation (2010), Jonas et al. (2011) have recently presented a paper claiming that the application of the Hencky strain to large simple-shear deformation is in error. In the present paper, it is shown that the claim of Jonas et al. is contrary to recent accepted knowledge on the Hencky strain.
“…As Jonas et al have pointed out in their paper, 4) it is true that the axes of the Hencky strain and its increment do not coincide during simple shear deformation. It is also true that, in papers published in the 1980s, 10,11) we find the consensus on the inapplicability of the Hencky strain to cases where the principal strain axes rotate during deformation. However, understanding on the Hencky strain has changed in the mid1990s.…”
Section: Rotation Of the Principal Axes Of Strainmentioning
The Hencky strain is a logarithmic strain extended to a three-dimensional analysis. Although Onaka has shown that the Hencky equivalent strain is an appropriate measure of large simple-shear deformation (2010), Jonas et al. (2011) have recently presented a paper claiming that the application of the Hencky strain to large simple-shear deformation is in error. In the present paper, it is shown that the claim of Jonas et al. is contrary to recent accepted knowledge on the Hencky strain.
“…(68) is relation (2.13) with Eqs. (2.11) and (2.15) in Bruhns and Lehmann [4], which says that the Jaumann rate of h should exactly give D in some cases; see also: Gurtin and Spear [19] and Hoger [30]. The main idea in finding Eq.…”
Section: The Logarithmic Rate and Related Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, this measure was considered as "essentially intractable" and of "particular usefulness" (refer e.g. to Fitzgerald [13] and Gurtin and Spear [19] and the references therein). Knowing the today's computational possibilities, however, we should overcome this position and use Hencky strains in descriptions of finite deformations.…”
Section: The Step Toward Finite Deformationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Her proof, however, was somewhat flawed as the material time derivative of ln V introduced in [31] failed to be objective (see also [40]). 42 Gurtin and Spear [19] and Hoger [30] derived conditions when under very specific circumstances the Jaumann rate of the logarithmic strain (ln V )…”
Section: The Logarithmic Rate and Related Propertiesmentioning
At the beginning of the last century two different types of constitutive relations to describe the complex behavior of elastoplastic material were presented. These were the deformation theory originally developed by Hencky and the Prandtl-Reuss theory. Whereas the former provides a direct solid-like relation of stress as function of strain, the latter has been based on an additive composition of elastic and plastic parts of the increments of strains. These in turn were taken as a solid-and fluid-like combination of the de Saint-Venant/Lévy theory with an incremental form of Hookes law.Even nowadays this Prandtl-Reuss theory is still accepted within the restriction of small elastic deformations, i.e. it is generally stated in most textbooks on plasticity that this theory due to a number of defects can not be applied to large deformations. In the present article it is shown that this restrictive statement may be no longer true. Introducing a specific objective time derivative it could be shown that these defects disappear.
“…In Section 6 we apply the general results of the preceding sections to the logarithmic strain tensors. We give a rigorous proof of an approximate formula for (In U)' due to Hill [4], and we obtain an improved version of an approximate formula for (ln V)° due to Gurtin and Spear [2].…”
Section: F(v) By F(v)= F(v)° + Wf(v) -F(v)wmentioning
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.