1995
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.1995.tb00348.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the relationship between leaf anatomy and CO2 diffusion through the mesophyll of hypostomatous leaves

Abstract: Internal conductances to CO2 transfer from the stomatal cavity to sites of carboxylation (gi) in hypostomatous sun‐and shade‐grown leaves of citrus, peach and Macadamia trees (Lloyd et al. 1992) were related to anatomical characteristics of mesophyll tissues. There was a consistent relationship between absorptance of photosynthetically active radiation and chlorophyll concentration (mmol m−2) for all leaves, including sclerophyllous Macadamia, whose transmittance was high despite its relatively thick leaves. I… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
261
2
2

Year Published

1997
1997
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 332 publications
(291 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(40 reference statements)
16
261
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The changes in leaf anatomy probably affect the conductance of CO 2 diffusion [40]. Thus, the reduction of mesophyll conductance was associated with thickening of the olive leaf mesophyll [41]. These results are consistent with the findings of studies of other plants as Ctenanthe setosa [2], and Triticum aestivum [14] in which water deficit caused decreased leaf thickness.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The changes in leaf anatomy probably affect the conductance of CO 2 diffusion [40]. Thus, the reduction of mesophyll conductance was associated with thickening of the olive leaf mesophyll [41]. These results are consistent with the findings of studies of other plants as Ctenanthe setosa [2], and Triticum aestivum [14] in which water deficit caused decreased leaf thickness.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…12%, Johnson 1926) in adult leaves of E. globulus, in addition to tissue density (Syvertsen et al 1995). In a survey of 21 species in northern Australia, Prior, Eamus & Bowman 2003) found a range of leaf density from 0.27 to 0.54 g cm -3 ; leaf density of the two eucalypts measured was 0.48 g cm -3 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also the case that leaf densities tend to be higher for high M A leaves (e.g. Kenzo et al, 2006), mostly likely due to greater cell wall thicknesses (Syvertsen et al, 1995) and that associated with these high leaf densities are lower water contents (at saturation) per unit dry weight for high M A leaves Poorter et al 2009) as well as a greater relative apoplastic water content (Oberbauer et al, 1987). Taken together, these observations mean that mesophyll protoplasmic volumes per unit dry weight should be substantially less for high M A upper canopy leaves and thus any potassium present being relatively more effective as an osmoticum per unit foliar dry-weight.…”
Section: Gradients In Carbon and Cation Concentrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%