2010
DOI: 10.3765/bls.v36i1.3909
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Reflexive-Antipassive Polysemy: Typological Convergence from Unrelated Languages

Abstract: In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt:This paper deals with the antipassive construction that has raised considerable interest in the syntactic description of ergative languages over the last few decades (Dixon 1979). Often defined on structural grounds, antipassive is said to be a derived intransitive construction with a two-place predicate, the object argument of which is either suppressed or realized as an oblique (Polinsky 2005). Tradition-ally, the antipassive is related to the ergative system. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Antipassive-verb markers are typically polyfunctional and may also express some other diathetic function (Polinsky 2017: 314;Say 2021). Different patterns of polyfunctionality (or syncretism) have been described in the literature (see, inter alia, Shibatani 2006: 239;Janic 2016aJanic , 2016bSansò 2017Sansò , 2018Jacques 2021), and so we only mention the most frequent ones here: incorporated reciprocal pronouns, indefinite pronouns and markers of middle voice (and thus often former reflexives). For example, the monovalent antipassive (marked by the circumfix k(a)-…-ti) in Cavineña (Pano-Tucanoan) is primarily used as the middle voice including reflexive and reciprocal functions (Guillaume 2008: 274ff ).…”
Section: Typology Of Antipassivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Antipassive-verb markers are typically polyfunctional and may also express some other diathetic function (Polinsky 2017: 314;Say 2021). Different patterns of polyfunctionality (or syncretism) have been described in the literature (see, inter alia, Shibatani 2006: 239;Janic 2016aJanic , 2016bSansò 2017Sansò , 2018Jacques 2021), and so we only mention the most frequent ones here: incorporated reciprocal pronouns, indefinite pronouns and markers of middle voice (and thus often former reflexives). For example, the monovalent antipassive (marked by the circumfix k(a)-…-ti) in Cavineña (Pano-Tucanoan) is primarily used as the middle voice including reflexive and reciprocal functions (Guillaume 2008: 274ff ).…”
Section: Typology Of Antipassivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the functional‐typological camp, patterns of syncretism are generally explained by resorting to some general semantic/functional core that encompasses the whole semantics of a grammatical item/construction. A case in point is Kemmer's () notion of “relative elaboration of events” as invoked, for instance, by Janic (, ) to account for the reflexive/reciprocal/antipassive syncretism:…”
Section: Antipassives: Universals and Variationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally speaking, the polysemy of associative -an-can be semantically accounted for through the cross-linguistically common concept of 'plurality of relations' (Lichtenberk 2000; Janic & Segerer 2011;Bostoen et al 2015: §3.5). In some languages, however, the associative has acquired functions that cannot be explained in this way.…”
Section: The Associative Suffix *-An-mentioning
confidence: 99%