1992
DOI: 10.1016/0022-0396(92)90107-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the reducibility of linear differential equations with quasiperiodic coefficients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
123
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 161 publications
(130 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
2
123
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it seems that these results can be carried over to the case of finite a and small b. Indeed, the numer-ical evidence of the present paper for finite values of (a, b), together with KAM-arguments regarding averaging, see e.g., [1,17,22,10], seem to be in favor of the following facts: to test the present examples of p for this phenomenon, but also to widen the class, e.g., by introducing extra parameters. Compare with [15,12].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, it seems that these results can be carried over to the case of finite a and small b. Indeed, the numer-ical evidence of the present paper for finite values of (a, b), together with KAM-arguments regarding averaging, see e.g., [1,17,22,10], seem to be in favor of the following facts: to test the present examples of p for this phenomenon, but also to widen the class, e.g., by introducing extra parameters. Compare with [15,12].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…Several results concerning nonreducibiltiy in similar or wider contexts can be found in [22,10,11], [15], [17,18], [19] and [3,4,8,9].…”
Section: Further Problems a Numerical Investigationmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…From (30) and l e m m a 1 3 w e h ave t hat S is well de ned (for every ' 2 E ), according to (21). From (31) and l e m m a 1 0 w e c a n b o u nd t he expression of (H S ) t hat a p pear in the transformed Hamiltonian, k (H S )k E (1) R (1) The t echniques that w e u s e t o c o n trol t he r e d uction in the di erent d o m ains when we u s e Cauchy e s t imates, are analogous to t he o n es used in all the previous bounds.…”
Section: Iterative Lemmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the previous step, we have a new approximation to the solution, x 1 , and we want to find a new transformation C 1 (θ) and a new reduced matrix B 1 such that (7) is satisfied with Q 1 ∞ ≈ ε 2 (this situation has already been considered in several places; see [2,34,33]). Let us introduce the matrices R and B 1 as (14) R…”
Section: Correcting the Approximation Of The Floquet Transformationmentioning
confidence: 99%