2016
DOI: 10.1002/2015pa002920
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the reconstruction of ocean circulation and climate based on the “Gardar Drift”

Abstract: Sediment-based reconstructions of bottom water velocity at the Gardar Drift are commonly interpreted to reflect changes in the eastern Nordic Seas overflows. Here we investigate the relationship between changes in the water that overflows through the Faroe Shetland Channel and downstream bottom velocity at the location of the Gardar Drift as represented in a 500 year long simulation with the Bergen Climate Model. We identify a region in our simulation proximal to the geographical location of the northern Garda… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While overflows have received less attention than other large‐scale features of the North Atlantic circulation in the simulations of the past millennium, the ability to constrain overflow rates from proxy information, including sortable silt and magnetic particles (see section ), makes this a useful model diagnostic. In the BCM model, Langehaug et al () linked velocity changes along the Gardar Drift to the Faroe Shetland Channel overflow, thus supporting the use of ISOW reconstructions from the Gardar Drift as proxies for overflow properties. They also found, however, that velocity changes downstream are not a reliable metric for the strength of the overflow and that, instead, the density of overflow waters can be a better proxy.…”
Section: Last Millennium Insights From Climate Modelsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…While overflows have received less attention than other large‐scale features of the North Atlantic circulation in the simulations of the past millennium, the ability to constrain overflow rates from proxy information, including sortable silt and magnetic particles (see section ), makes this a useful model diagnostic. In the BCM model, Langehaug et al () linked velocity changes along the Gardar Drift to the Faroe Shetland Channel overflow, thus supporting the use of ISOW reconstructions from the Gardar Drift as proxies for overflow properties. They also found, however, that velocity changes downstream are not a reliable metric for the strength of the overflow and that, instead, the density of overflow waters can be a better proxy.…”
Section: Last Millennium Insights From Climate Modelsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The multidecadal variability observed in the Iceland Scotland Overflow Water (ISOW) compared with the Gray et al () AMV reconstruction, adapted from Mjell et al (). At top, the detrended sortable silt (SS) data from core GS06‐144‐09MC‐D (thin gray line with three‐point smoothing in black), is a proxy for changes in the bottom water flow speed along the southward flow path of ISOW interpreted to reflect changes in the strength of ISOW (Langehaug et al, ; Mjell et al, ). The age model for the SS record uses published dates from Mjell et al () but is updated with new constraints on the core top age using the carbon isotope Suess effect (Irvali et al, in preparation/personal communication).…”
Section: Paleoclimate Evidence Of Amv Multidecadal Amoc Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cross-correlation has nevertheless been recently applied to climatic signals (Langehaug et al, 2016), including Pa/Th and δ 13 C Cw records from the last glacial (Henry et al, 2016). In the latter study, cross-correlation between marine records from 25 two deep Bermuda Rise cores and the NGRIP ice oxygen isotopic record was used to infer that deep Bermuda Rise each individual time series, and, therefore, also the relative dating error of one time series with respect to the other.…”
Section: Stationary Cross-correlation Versus Cross-wavelet Results 15mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this simple method has been applied to climatic time series in previous studies (Langehaug et al, 2016;Henry et al, 2016), such results must be interpreted with caution, since the method has been designed for signals that are stationary in time and is, therefore, not suitable for climatic signals. …”
Section: Average Relative Phases 15mentioning
confidence: 99%