2006
DOI: 10.1017/s0022112005007226
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the realm of validity of strongly nonlinear asymptotic approximations for internal waves

Abstract: Analytical and numerical results from recently developed strongly nonlinear asymptotic models are compared and validated with experimental observations of internal gravity waves and results from the numerical integrations of Euler equations for solitary waves at the interface of two-fluid systems. The focus of this investigation is on regimes where large amplitudes are attained, where the classical weakly nonlinear theories prove inadequate. Two asymptotically different regimes are examined in detail: shallow … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

17
93
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
17
93
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These "table top" solitary waves and conjugate states do not occur in the KdV equation, but do appear when the cubic nonlinearity is included in the KdV-type models (Kakutani and Yamasaki 1978;Helfrich and Melville 2006), though with a different limiting amplitude. The MCC solitary wave properties, including the limiting conjugate state amplitude, agree quite well with fully nonlinear and nonhydrostatic theories, numerical calculations, laboratory experiments, and oceanic observations (e.g., Choi and Camassa 1999;Michallet and Barthélemy 1998;Ostrovsky and Grue 2003;Camassa et al 2006). The MCC equations, unlike their weakly nonlinear counterparts, do not filter out Kelvin-Helmholtz instability (Jo and Choi 2002).…”
Section: ͑13͒supporting
confidence: 67%
“…These "table top" solitary waves and conjugate states do not occur in the KdV equation, but do appear when the cubic nonlinearity is included in the KdV-type models (Kakutani and Yamasaki 1978;Helfrich and Melville 2006), though with a different limiting amplitude. The MCC solitary wave properties, including the limiting conjugate state amplitude, agree quite well with fully nonlinear and nonhydrostatic theories, numerical calculations, laboratory experiments, and oceanic observations (e.g., Choi and Camassa 1999;Michallet and Barthélemy 1998;Ostrovsky and Grue 2003;Camassa et al 2006). The MCC equations, unlike their weakly nonlinear counterparts, do not filter out Kelvin-Helmholtz instability (Jo and Choi 2002).…”
Section: ͑13͒supporting
confidence: 67%
“…The steady solitary waves of the new stable model are compared to those of the Boussinesq MCC, since, in the case of zero far-field shear, MCC solutions compare well with experiments [12]. The comparisons show that the agreement is generally excellent, and several new qualitative features of large amplitude internal waves with background shear are captured.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…We now make the Boussinesq approximation, by replacing ρ 1 and ρ 2 in inertia terms by the mean (unit) density in (12)- (13), and consider only cases in which far-field conditions fix Q = 0 (a constant Q can then be removed by a Gallilean transformation). Thus, (12) and (13) becomē…”
Section: Formulationmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, in the last decades, it has been studied by many physicists and mathematicians, with regard to both well-posedness [23,24,2,3,32] and asymptotic models [16,17,11,19,14,6,29,30]. A significant step in the theory of internal waves was made in 2008 by Bona, Lannes and Saut [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%