2014
DOI: 10.4064/cm134-1-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the rate of convergence in the weak invariance principle for dependent random variables with applications to Markov chains

Abstract: Abstract. We prove an invariance principle for non-stationary random processes and establish a rate of convergence under a new type of mixing condition. The dependence is exponentially decaying in the gap between the past and the future and is controlled by an assumption on the characteristic function of the finite dimensional increments of the process. The distinct feature of the new mixing condition is that the dependence increases exponentially in the dimension of the increments. The proposed mixing propert… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…from Lemma 5.6 in Grama et al (2014). By choosing n 0 sufficient great, the first assertion of the lemma follows from (3.14), (3.15) and (3.16) taking into account that…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 90%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…from Lemma 5.6 in Grama et al (2014). By choosing n 0 sufficient great, the first assertion of the lemma follows from (3.14), (3.15) and (3.16) taking into account that…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…First, we check that the weak invariance principle with rate stated in Grama et al (2014) (Theorem 2.1) may be applied to the sequence (ρ(g k , X k−1 )) k≥0 .The hypotheses C1, C2 and C3 of this theorem are given in terms of Fourier transform of the partial sums of S n ; combining the expressions (2.1), (2.2), (2.3) and the properties of the Fourier operators (P t ) t , we verify in the next section that these conditions are satisfied in our context. This leads to the following simpler but sufficient statement.…”
Section: Coupling Argument and Proof Of Theorems 12 And 13mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations