On the Question of the Diagnosis of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome

Нисевич, Л. Л.; Kriger, Or; Селютина, Н. С.; Никишцев, И. Н.; Коноплёва, Т. Н.; Павлова, М. С.

doi:10.15690/vsp.v14i6.1472

Cited by 2 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 45 publications

(56 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Наиболее часто в обеих группах диагностировали патологию бронхолегочной системы. У умерших 1-й группы в большинстве случаев выявлялись ОРВИ с минимальными патологоанатомическими признаками; катаральный ларинго- [13,15]. Патология сердечно-сосудистой системы в 1-й группе диагностировалась значительно реже, чем во 2-й (55,2 и 87,7 % соответственно).…”

Section: Discussionunclassified

“…Несмотря на постоянное совершенствование рекомендаций по предотвращению развития синдрома [12], дальнейшего снижения случаев СВС в настоящее время не отмечается, и проблема продолжает оставаться актуальной. Несмотря на то, что в России обязательная регистрация случаев СВС была введена в 1999 г., сопоставить данные зарубежных исследователей с данными по Российской Федерации не представляется возможным из-за различных нарушений протокола исследования случаев СВС [13,14]. Это приводит к большому разбросу показателей по субъектам Федерации [15].…”

unclassified

“…Hе все случаи внебольничной скоропостижной смерти младенцев (ВССМ) являются СВС [16], эти понятия нередко смешиваются, что ведет к разбросу показателей диагностики синдрома. У многих скоропостижно скончавшихся за пределами стационара младенцев диагностируется различная врожденная и приобретенная патология [13]. Для того чтобы дифференцировать ВССМ и СВС, предпринимались неоднократные попытки выявления патогномоничных признаков СВС как за рубежом [17,18], так и в России [19][20][21].…”

unclassified

See 2 more Smart Citations

How Frequently Does out-of Hospital Sudden Unexpected Infants Death Represent the Sudden Infant Death Syndrome?

Нисевич

Kriger²,

Селютина³

et al. 2020

Pediatr. farmakol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background. 19.6 % of all fatal cases among Russian children who died in the first year of life are registered out-of hospital, and they are usually sudden. Out-of-hospital sudden unexpected infant death (OSUID) could be confused with sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) followed by the wide variation in the diagnostic indicators of the syndrome.The aim of the study is to reveal the pathological changes in the tissues and organs of 420 cases of OSUID (group 1) compared with 350 cases of death in the hospital (group 2), to estimate the conformity of the final diagnoses and to identify cases of OSUID, which were SIDS.Methods. From 2009 to 2016 pathoanatomical and virological study of the organs of 420 cases of OSUID (group 1) and 350 babies who died in a hospital were carried out.Results. It was established that the age of infants of the 1st group at the time of death in 71 % of cases corresponded to the age of SIDS. In terms of gestational age and body weight at birth babies of the 1st group turned out to be much more prosperous. Signs of rapid onset of death in this group: plethora of internal organs (83.3 %) and petechial hemorrhages (75.5 %) were present significantly more often than in the 2nd. In the 1st group, predominantly light acute respiratory viral infections (ARVI) with minimal pathologic signs and pneumonia were diagnosed, but pneumonia in 33.3 % not detected at autopsy. Purulent tracheobronchitis (0 and 21.4 %), bacterial pneumonia (6.3 and 26.3 %), a large area of lung damage (3.8 and 56.1 %) were detected much less frequently in the 1st group. In 38 % of the 1st group, pneumonia was the only cause of death, and in no case in the 2nd. Pathology of the cardiovascular system (55.2 and 87.7 %), central nervous system (58.6 and 90.9 %);urogenital system (34.8 and 62.9), inflammation of the membranes and brain tissue (21.9 and 70.0 %), signs of past or current intrauterine viral infection (29.5 and 64.0 %) in the 1st group was diagnosed much less frequently than in the 2nd, but congenital syphilis, HIV infection and hepatitis C — 3 times more often (12.9 and 3.7 %). The more frequent pathology of the adrenal glands in the 1st group (66.7 and 34 %) could cause inadequate responses to minimal exposure to external factors, including mild acute respiratory viral infections. The diagnosis of SIDS was made in 3 cases and in 3 more it was questionable. However, the presence of multisystemic pathology excludes the diagnosis of SIDS. The diagnosis of SIDS could be established in 30 cases in cases of slight ARVI without intoxication, shock liver or disseminated intravascular coagulation syndrome.Conclusion. The most cases of sudden death occurred in not obvious life-threatening conditions in socially disadvantaged families in the absence of adequate observation, diagnosis and treatment.

show abstract

Section: Discussionunclassified

unclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

How Frequently Does out-of Hospital Sudden Unexpected Infants Death Represent the Sudden Infant Death Syndrome?

Нисевич

Kriger²,

Селютина³

et al. 2020

Pediatr. farmakol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

The Importance of Social Factors in Out-the Hospital Sudden Death of Infants of the First Year of Life

Нисевич

Kriger

Selyutina

et al. 2019

jour

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The importance of social factors in sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) has been proved, but their contribution to the unexpected out-of-hospital sudden infant death (OSID) has not yet been executed. There is presented the importance of social risk factors for OSID in 336 babies suddenly died beyond the hospital (1st group) in comparison with the 350 babies died in the hospital (2nd group). In 85.7%, several adverse factors were revealed, in 27.4% - in the 2nd group. Low socio-economic status of the family in the 1st group was observed in 34% of cases, and in the 2nd group - in 8% of cases. In the first group the number of antisocial families with the mother or both parents being alcohol or drug abuse appeared by 5 times more. In the 1st group the number of families with unregistered marriage and single mothers were 3.1 times more than in the 2nd group. 20.8% of women in Group 1 were not observed in antenatal clinics during pregnancy, and 12% of persons in this group and children remained without medical and dispensary supervision. Thus, families with a low socioeconomic level and antisocial families are a group of high-risk OSID infants of the first year of life, which determines the need for the active preventive work of health authorities and guardianship, the migration service and law enforcement agencies.

show abstract

On the Question of the Diagnosis of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome

Cited by 2 publications

References 45 publications

How Frequently Does out-of Hospital Sudden Unexpected Infants Death Represent the Sudden Infant Death Syndrome?

How Frequently Does out-of Hospital Sudden Unexpected Infants Death Represent the Sudden Infant Death Syndrome?

The Importance of Social Factors in Out-the Hospital Sudden Death of Infants of the First Year of Life

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About