2006
DOI: 10.1017/s0308210500004443
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the quasi-nodal map for the Sturm–Liouville problem

Abstract: We show that the space of Sturm–Liouville operators characterized by H = (q, α, β) ∈ L1 (0, 1) × [0, π)2 such that is homeomorphic to the partition set of the space of all admissible sequences which form sequences that converge to q, α, and β individually. This space, Γ, of quasi-nodal sequences is a superset of, and is more natural than, the space of asymptotically nodal sequences defined in Law and Tsay (On the well-posedness of the inverse nodal problem. Inv. Probl.17 (2001), 1493–1512). The definition of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, when the number of points of discontinuity is more than 1, we see how the behavior of trace and oscillations of eigenfunctions of a boundary value problem with retarded argument which contains a spectral parameter in the boundary conditions change. We point out that our results are extension and/or generalization to those in Gelfand and Levitan, Pikula, Yang, Hira, Yurko, Dikii, Shieh and Yurko, and Cheng and Law . For example, if the retardation function Δ≡0 in , αi=0,βi=0, δ =1, and γ =1, we have the formula of the first regularized trace for the classical Sturm‐Liouville operator which is called Gelfand‐Levitan formula (see Gelfand and Levitan).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Thus, when the number of points of discontinuity is more than 1, we see how the behavior of trace and oscillations of eigenfunctions of a boundary value problem with retarded argument which contains a spectral parameter in the boundary conditions change. We point out that our results are extension and/or generalization to those in Gelfand and Levitan, Pikula, Yang, Hira, Yurko, Dikii, Shieh and Yurko, and Cheng and Law . For example, if the retardation function Δ≡0 in , αi=0,βi=0, δ =1, and γ =1, we have the formula of the first regularized trace for the classical Sturm‐Liouville operator which is called Gelfand‐Levitan formula (see Gelfand and Levitan).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…In particular, Lemma 2.1 (II) corrects the corresponding statements of Lemma 3.1 in [19], where λ n is expressed in terms of n, but not n − 1. The confusion stems from a basic counting lemma which should state | √ λ n − (n − 1)π| < π/2 for large n (see [5,16]). The detailed discussion depends on the boundary conditions.…”
Section: Preliminaries and Lemmasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inverse nodal problems for classical Sturm-Liouville operators have been studied fairly completely. The main results in this area are presented in the monographs [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,9,10,12,13,14,15,17,19,20] and other works.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the eigenvalue λ n can be replaced by its asymptotic expansion involving 1 0 q only so that the right-hand side above is a sequence of step functions depending only on the nodal data plus the constant 1 0 q. Recently we, extending the result in [13], showed that ( [4]) the space of Sturm-Liouville operators characterized by H = (q, α, β) ∈ L 1 (0, 1) × [0, π) 2 such that 1 0 q = 0 is homeomorphic to the partition set of the space of quasinodal sequences, i.e. the space of all admissible sequences X = X (n) k which form sequences that converge to q, α and β individually.…”
Section: Consider the Sturm-liouville Equation (In Liouville Normal F...mentioning
confidence: 99%