2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.09.063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the pros and cons of using temporal derivatives to assess brain functional connectivity

Abstract: The study of correlations between brain regions is an important chapter of the analysis of large-scale brain spatiotemporal dynamics. In particular, novel methods suited to extract dynamic changes in mutual correlations are needed. Here we scrutinize a recently reported metric dubbed "Multiplication of Temporal Derivatives" (MTD) which is based on the temporal derivative of each time series. The formal comparison of the MTD formula with the Pearson correlation of the derivatives reveals only minor differences,… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Encouragingly, we found a similar pattern of information with high spatial correlations between the two methods across multiple studies (Lim et al 2016, Wang et al 2016. MTD has been found to be less sensitive to low frequency drifts, due to the inherent nature of differencing acting as a high-pass filter, but also to have less signal-to-noise ratio (Ochab et al 2019). As a result, the susceptibility of MTD to higher frequency signal (Shine et al 2015) as compared to SWPC necessarily means that the properties of the connectivity information it contains are different.…”
Section: Dcss Are Comparable Across Sliding Window and Temporal Diffesupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Encouragingly, we found a similar pattern of information with high spatial correlations between the two methods across multiple studies (Lim et al 2016, Wang et al 2016. MTD has been found to be less sensitive to low frequency drifts, due to the inherent nature of differencing acting as a high-pass filter, but also to have less signal-to-noise ratio (Ochab et al 2019). As a result, the susceptibility of MTD to higher frequency signal (Shine et al 2015) as compared to SWPC necessarily means that the properties of the connectivity information it contains are different.…”
Section: Dcss Are Comparable Across Sliding Window and Temporal Diffesupporting
confidence: 60%
“…In recent years, functional activity in general has been intensely analysed with a variety of methods 6 . However, blood oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) signals have a nontrivially associated autocorrelation and cross-correlation structure 7 and remain notoriously challenging to analyse due to their very low temporal resolution. Motivated by prior work, we applied the fractal methodology to test for regional differences in BOLD scaling properties between the tasks and experimental phases of a working memory experiment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, a threshold for detecting strong activity is chosen, (typically the results remain unchanged when using a range of 1 − 2 SDs) and for each time series, the timing of each upward threshold crossing is determined ( Figure 1A ). Note that the number of threshold crossings depends on the auto-correlation of the BOLD signals (which stays in the range 0.6–0.85 Ochab et al, 2019 ) and more generally on the exponent of the 1/ f α frequency spectrum. Empirically, for the threshold of 1σ, in a BOLD signal we find on average 8.5 ± 2.8 upward crossings per 4 min of fMRI scan.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%