2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2010.09.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the proper use of the Bigeleisen–Mayer equation and corrections to it in the calculation of isotopic fractionation equilibrium constants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

7
93
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
7
93
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The simplest and most common approach, usually a) Electronic mail: konstantin.karandashev@epfl.ch b) Electronic mail: jiri.vanicek@epfl.ch referred to as the "harmonic approximation" or "Urey model," assumes (i) separability of rotations and vibrations, (ii) rigid rotor approximation for the rotations, and (iii) harmonic oscillator approximation for the vibrations. 1,2,5 Although there exist various corrections that incorporate the leading effects of rovibrational coupling, nonrigidity of the rotor, or anharmonicity of the vibrations, [6][7][8] this perturbative approach is not always sufficient; indeed, there are examples of systems in which these corrections can even yield worse results than the Urey model. 5 We therefore employ a more rigorous method that avoids these approximations altogether and treats the potential energy surface, rotations, and rovibrational coupling exactly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simplest and most common approach, usually a) Electronic mail: konstantin.karandashev@epfl.ch b) Electronic mail: jiri.vanicek@epfl.ch referred to as the "harmonic approximation" or "Urey model," assumes (i) separability of rotations and vibrations, (ii) rigid rotor approximation for the rotations, and (iii) harmonic oscillator approximation for the vibrations. 1,2,5 Although there exist various corrections that incorporate the leading effects of rovibrational coupling, nonrigidity of the rotor, or anharmonicity of the vibrations, [6][7][8] this perturbative approach is not always sufficient; indeed, there are examples of systems in which these corrections can even yield worse results than the Urey model. 5 We therefore employ a more rigorous method that avoids these approximations altogether and treats the potential energy surface, rotations, and rovibrational coupling exactly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Readers are referred to Schauble (2004) and Liu et al (2010) for the details of such calculation. Given the RPFRs of a pair of compounds or minerals in equilibrium, the isotopic fractionation factor a can be derived from the ratio of their RPFRs (or b factors) if there is only one isotope substituted:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These calculations consider pure harmonic vibrational frequencies and rigid rotator approximations. Such approximations do not apply, however, to the diatomic molecule of hydrogen, especially as anharmonic oscillations are likely to become stronger at high temperatures (Bigeleisen and Mayer, 1947;Bigeleisen, 1955;Wolfsberg, 1969;Wolfsberg et al, 1970;Liu et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%