2011
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1976203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Propensity to Surrender a Variable Annuity Contract - An Empirical Analysis of Dynamic Policyholder Behaviour

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even if insurers do not charge for optimality in practice it is still of interest to examine optimal behaviour to understand the worst case scenarios. Knoller et al (2011) conduct a statistical analysis of the Japanese VA marketplace to learn the extent to which rational lapsation occurs in the real world. The field of behavioural finance helps explain why policyholders may act irrationally.…”
Section: A Discussion On Imperfect Models and Subrational Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even if insurers do not charge for optimality in practice it is still of interest to examine optimal behaviour to understand the worst case scenarios. Knoller et al (2011) conduct a statistical analysis of the Japanese VA marketplace to learn the extent to which rational lapsation occurs in the real world. The field of behavioural finance helps explain why policyholders may act irrationally.…”
Section: A Discussion On Imperfect Models and Subrational Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, Knoller et al (2014) analyze policyholder surrender behavior for VAs with simple GMABs based on Japanese data. Unlike the results for conventional products, the authors find that the value of the embedded guarantee has by far the largest explanatory power-whereas they find mixed evidence for the EFH but mild support that financial literacy impacts surrender.…”
Section: Variable Annuities and Other Equity-linked Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is undoubtedly hard to anticipate correctly the policyholder behaviour, e.g. to specify her policy as a function of the moneyness of the guarantees (see [26], [24] and [2] for the different factors influencing lapse rates). On the other hand, the dynamic approach overcomes this subjective side by taking a worst case scenario from the insurer's point of view, but is subject to the curse of dimensionality and hence very often forces to adopt a very simple setup.…”
Section: Review On the Literature On Gmwbsmentioning
confidence: 99%