2003
DOI: 10.1007/s000140300003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the projective geometry of rational homogeneous varieties

Abstract: Abstract.We determine the varieties of linear spaces on rational homogeneous varieties, provide explicit geometric models for these spaces, and establish basic facts about the local differential geometry of rational homogeneous varieties. Mathematics Subject Classification (2000). 14M15, 20G05.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
180
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 151 publications
(185 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
4
180
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Fano variety of lines through a given point can be identified with the spinor variety G Q (5, 10) in its minimal embedding (the projectivization of a half-spin representation). In particular its degree equals 12 (see [LM,3.1]). Applying proposition 3.1, we get the relation…”
Section: Higher Quantum Poincaré Dualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Fano variety of lines through a given point can be identified with the spinor variety G Q (5, 10) in its minimal embedding (the projectivization of a half-spin representation). In particular its degree equals 12 (see [LM,3.1]). Applying proposition 3.1, we get the relation…”
Section: Higher Quantum Poincaré Dualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was proved in [LM,Theorem 4.8] that when P is defined by a long simple root, F o is homogeneous under of G/P by suppressing the marked node and marking the nodes that were connected to it. For example, if G/P = E 7 /P 7 then F o is a copy of the Cayley plane E 6 /P 6 ≃ E 6 /P 1 , whose dimension is 16 -hence c 1 (E 7 /P 7 ) = 18.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this is identical to Lemma 3.6 of [2], we give details of the proof for the convenience of the reader since the proof there is omitted. For the case of (even) symplectic Grassmannians, the following lemma was originally proven in Proposition 3.2.1 of [9] or Corollary 5.5 of [13].…”
Section: Variety Of Minimal Rational Tangentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When X = G/P with G simple, this is [11,Theorem 4.3] and [5]. (This is true for any minimally embedded homogeneous variety G/P I , with G simple, where I indexes the deleted simple roots, as long as I does not contain an "exposed short root" in the language of [11].…”
Section: Generalized Cominuscule Varieties: Proof Of Theorem 111mentioning
confidence: 99%