2013
DOI: 10.4171/ggd/208
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the product decomposition conjecture for finite simple groups

Abstract: Abstract. We prove that if G is a finite simple group of Lie type and S a subset of G of size at least two then G is a product of at most c log |G|/ log |S| conjugates of S, where c depends only on the Lie rank of G. This confirms a conjecture of Liebeck, Nikolov and Shalev in the case of families of simple groups of bounded rank. We also obtain various related results about products of conjugates of a set within a group.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(50 reference statements)
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both of these conjectures are proved for groups of Lie type of bounded rank [7,12,24]. We are able to give partial results for groups of Lie type of unbounded rank that complement those already in the literature due to the original Gowers trick.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Both of these conjectures are proved for groups of Lie type of bounded rank [7,12,24]. We are able to give partial results for groups of Lie type of unbounded rank that complement those already in the literature due to the original Gowers trick.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 53%
“…The other is a result of Gill, Pyber, Short and Szabó [2]: Theorem 3 differs to that of Rodgers and Saxl in three important respects, two good, one not so good: First, our result pertains to all finite simple groups G of Lie type. Second, our result does not just pertain to conjugacy classes, but to subsets of the group, provided we are free to take conjugates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The next result was obtained independently in [4, 14]. The subsequent corollary is an easy consequence, and can be found in [2]. Note that, by the translate of a set S in a group G, we mean a set of form Sg:={sgsS} where g is some element of G.…”
Section: Necessary Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations