2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.aim.2017.06.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the pro-semisimple completion of the fundamental group of a smooth variety over a finite field

Abstract: Abstract. Let Π be the fundamental group of a smooth variety X over Fp. Let Q be an algebraic closure of Q. Given a non-Archimedean place λ of Q prime to p, consider the λ-adic pro-semisimple completion of Π as an object of the groupoid whose objects are pro-semisimple groups and whose morphisms are isomorphisms up to conjugation by elements of the neutral connected component. We prove that this object does not depend on λ. If dim X = 1 we also prove a crystalline generalization of this fact.We deduce this fro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the result on Frobenius tori, we do not use Hartl-Pál's theorem. It is also worth mentioning that Drinfeld proved the independence of the entire arithmetic monodromy groups (not only the neutral component) over Q , [19]. He uses a stronger representation-theoretic reconstruction theorem (see Remark 4.3.10).…”
Section: Relations With Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the result on Frobenius tori, we do not use Hartl-Pál's theorem. It is also worth mentioning that Drinfeld proved the independence of the entire arithmetic monodromy groups (not only the neutral component) over Q , [19]. He uses a stronger representation-theoretic reconstruction theorem (see Remark 4.3.10).…”
Section: Relations With Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From this we shall deduce Theorem 6.11 in Subsection 6.3, which says that any absolutely irreducible compatible system has absolutely irreducible reduction for almost all λ. The proof of this was first published by Drinfeld in [Dri15], and we basically give a more detailed version of his proof. The final Subsection 6.4 contains the proof of Theorem 6.14, which is part (c) of Theorem 1.1 in the absolutely irreducible case.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…(a) The definition of the motivic group M should also include conditions at the places of E above p; this is possible using the work [Abe] of Abe that attaches certain isocrystals at places above p and thus extends the work of L. Lafforgue; cf. also [Dri15]. For the present work these places are irrelevant, and so we omit them.…”
Section: The Motivic Groupmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For a general reductive group G the notion of compatible family is subtle (because the obvious condition on the conjugacy classes of the Frobenius elements is not sufficient). In [Dri15] Drinfeld gave the right conditions to define compatible families and proved that any continuous semisimple morphism Gal(F /F ) → G(Q ℓ ) factorizing through π 1 (U, η) for some open dense U ⊂ X (and such that the Zariski closure of its image is semisimple) belongs to a unique compatible family.…”
Section: Independence On ℓmentioning
confidence: 99%