2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2016.10.083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the prediction of interfacial tension (IFT) for water-hydrocarbon gas system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A RBF neural network has the ability to straightforwardly convert the data into a multi‐dimensional space and treat arbitrary scattered data . This methodology has a wide application in different fields and sciences such as chemical engineering, petroleum engineering, mathematical science, nanotechnology, etc . In contrast to MLP which may have two or more hidden layers, all RBF neural network models have only one hidden layer.…”
Section: Model Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A RBF neural network has the ability to straightforwardly convert the data into a multi‐dimensional space and treat arbitrary scattered data . This methodology has a wide application in different fields and sciences such as chemical engineering, petroleum engineering, mathematical science, nanotechnology, etc . In contrast to MLP which may have two or more hidden layers, all RBF neural network models have only one hidden layer.…”
Section: Model Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[70] This methodology has a wide application in different fields and sciences such as chemical engineering, petroleum engineering, mathematical science, nanotechnology, etc. [69,[71][72][73] In contrast to MLP which may have two or more hidden layers, all RBF neural network models have only one hidden layer. In the RBF model, inputs are transferred to the output layer by the neurons at hidden layer.…”
Section: Radial Basis Function Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the following section, some of the recent models in this area are briefly reviewed. It should be noted, as the dominant fluids that exist in the reservoir are oil and water, that the majority of ML models were developed to predict the IFT in oil−brine [22,23], water−hydrocarbon [24,25], brine−hydrocarbon [26][27][28], and CO 2 −brine [29][30][31][32] systems. Ahmadi and Mahmoudi [33] predicted the gas-oil IFT with least squares support vector machines (LSSVM) as a well-known ML method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the four typical entrained droplet models above, the gas‐liquid surface tension and drag coefficient are all constant. The gas‐liquid surface tension, however, varies with temperature and pressure, 9‐16 and the drag coefficient is a function of droplet deformation and Reynolds number 17 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the four typical entrained droplet models above, the gas-liquid surface tension and drag coefficient are all constant. The gas-liquid surface tension, however, varies with temperature and pressure, [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] and the drag coefficient is a function of droplet deformation and Reynolds number. 17 Wang et al 18 incorporated the influence of droplet deformation caused by the pressure differential on the drag coefficient but did not consider surface tension variation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%