2019
DOI: 10.1080/23311916.2019.1679067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the prediction capabilities of two SGS models for large-eddy simulations of turbulent incompressible wall-bounded flows in OpenFOAM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We used one of OF’s standard solvers for turbulent incompressible flow, pimpleFoam , for all experiments. This solver allows for turbulence modelling and uses PIMPLE technique for pressure–velocity coupling, a more stable version of the standard PISO method [49] , [50] .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used one of OF’s standard solvers for turbulent incompressible flow, pimpleFoam , for all experiments. This solver allows for turbulence modelling and uses PIMPLE technique for pressure–velocity coupling, a more stable version of the standard PISO method [49] , [50] .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, the carrier phase of the particle-laden flow was simulated using a turbulent LES incompressible solver on an Eulerian grid. The sub-grid scale dynamics was modelled by using the Coherent Structures Sub-Grid-Scale (SGS) model proposed by Kobayashi [38] and validated in Ramirez-Pastran and Duque-Daza [39]. In order to maintain constant fluid mass flow rate conditions in the streamwise direction, a dynamically computed momentum source was prescribed as a volumetric momentum source.…”
Section: Carrier Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The computational model was solved using the set of C++ libraries and solvers of OpenFOAM which allow to obtain numerical solution of systems of partial differential equations through spatial discretization based on the finite volume method (FVM). OpenFOAM (OF) has become one important tool for CFD researchers and practitioners alike, and its use is becoming more widespread in the numerical modelling community (see Ramirez-Pastran and Duque-Daza [39], Weller et al [56], Hrvoje et al [57], Jasak [58], Chen et al [59], Iturrioz et al [60]). Particularly, in line with the scope of this work, an incompressible turbulent flow solver has been selected to simulate the evolution and dynamics of the carrier phase presented in Equations ( 1) and (2) (see Ramirez-Pastran and Duque-Daza [39]).…”
Section: Complementary Details Of the Computational Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This choice is made because of the ability of the SGS TKE to evaluate the forces and model the flows in the near walls. The classical Smagorisky model does not allow modelling of the viscous sub-layer of the boundary layer without drastically increasing the number of cells [20]. Thus, ν sgs is written:…”
Section: Large Eddy Simulation Turbulence Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%