2013
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1312.4518
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the precanonical structure of the Schrödinger wave functional

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
56
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
9
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…And what does the Schrödinger equation look like, once we know the classical Hamilton-Jacobi equation (20). Although these questions have not been addressed in general, let us note that there have been studies of quantization in the De Donder-Weyl Hamiltonian theory, where the quantization of momenta is based on generalized Poisson brackets, and a field-theoretic generalization of the Schrödinger equation is proposed that features a Clifford-valued wave function, and reduces to the De Donder-Weyl Hamilton-Jacobi equation in the classical limit [6,14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…And what does the Schrödinger equation look like, once we know the classical Hamilton-Jacobi equation (20). Although these questions have not been addressed in general, let us note that there have been studies of quantization in the De Donder-Weyl Hamiltonian theory, where the quantization of momenta is based on generalized Poisson brackets, and a field-theoretic generalization of the Schrödinger equation is proposed that features a Clifford-valued wave function, and reduces to the De Donder-Weyl Hamilton-Jacobi equation in the classical limit [6,14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One possible method to approach the canonical equations ( 13) is the following. Suppose P (q) is given, that obeys the Hamiltonian constraint H(q, P (q)) = 0 (14) on some open subset of the configuration space C. By differentiation, we obtain, according to the chain rule (A41), ∂q H( q, P (q)) + ∂q Ṗ (q) • ∂ P H(q, P (q)) = 0, (15) and using the first canonical equation (13a), we find λ ∂q H( q, P (q)) = − ∂q Ṗ (q) • dΓ.…”
Section: Local Hamilton-jacobi Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Without a space-like foliation, the polysymplectic formalism provides a manifestly spacetime covariant formulation. The polymomentum phase-space is endowed with a canonical (n + 1)-form, called the polysymplectic form [16,17,18,19], which plays a similar role to the one of the standard symplectic 2-form. A bracket may be induced in the polymometum phasespace by this polysymplectic form, which results to be a graded generalization of the Poisson bracket, called the Poisson-Gerstenhaber bracket [19,20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A bracket may be induced in the polymometum phasespace by this polysymplectic form, which results to be a graded generalization of the Poisson bracket, called the Poisson-Gerstenhaber bracket [19,20]. The Hamiltonian field equations encountered within this formalism, known as the De Donder-Weyl equations, can be written in terms of the Poisson-Gerstenhaber bracket [16,17,18,19,20] with all spacetime variables treated on an equal footing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation