2013
DOI: 10.1134/s1063783413040197
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the power-law pressure dependence of the plastic strain rate of crystals under intense shock wave loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Malygin, Ogarkov, and Andriyash have recently given a dislocation model explanation of the fourth power law in which dislocation generation accounts for a large part of the pressure dependence but dislocation drag resistance to dislocation motion is also involved. [64] B.…”
Section: ½12mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Malygin, Ogarkov, and Andriyash have recently given a dislocation model explanation of the fourth power law in which dislocation generation accounts for a large part of the pressure dependence but dislocation drag resistance to dislocation motion is also involved. [64] B.…”
Section: ½12mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Malygin et al, 2013). In the absence of any thermal assistance homogeneous nucleation can occur only if the applied stress is at least as large as the theoretical shear strength of the crystal lattice (Tschopp and McDowell, 2008).…”
Section: Dynamic Discrete Dislocation Plasticity Simulations Of Sourcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 True stress-true strain curves for large and small grain-size 2169 samples loaded via SHPB in compression Fig. 8 Flow stress at 10 % strain determined from this research and other austenitic stainless steels; 2169 from Follansbee et al [12,13], Nitronic 50 from Guo and Nemat-Nasser [30], 304L from Follansbee [13] and 316L from Follansbee [13], Sencer et al [25] and Gray et al [31] coefficient A. Malygin et al [36] related A to the inverse of the dislocation viscous drag coefficient however they were unable to match the theory to data within published limits on the values of the coefficient. Very little else has been discussed in the literature about the origins of A although it seems reasonable, as has been hypothesized by Millett et al [37], that A could also be considered to be related to deformation mechanisms at play in shocked materials, particularly a material's ability to accommodate plasticity via dislocation generation and motion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…discounting the points where the Bland number (a dimensionless number defined by Swegle and Grady [32] as the ratio of sample thickness to steady-wave propagation distance as defined by Bland [33]) is less than unity. Previous research has suggested that the fourth power relation is related to dissipative mechanisms at the shock front, including dislocation activity in crystalline materials [34] or more specifically the nucleation, density and velocity of dislocations [35] and the power law pressure dependence of the density of geometrically necessary dislocations generated at the shock wave front in combination with the rate of viscous motion of dislocations [36]. As the fourth power rule appears to be largely universal, particularly for metallic materials, the division of data from different materials appears via the Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%