2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2014.09.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the potential balance among compulsory education outcomes through econometric and multiobjective programming analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2010) and Luque et al. (2015) use a similar procedure, involving econometric analysis and reference point methods, to evaluate workers’ satisfaction and students’ achievement, respectively. Nevertheless, to the best of our knowledge, we are the first to apply this combination of econometric and GP techniques, together with the use of scenarios and under a robust environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2010) and Luque et al. (2015) use a similar procedure, involving econometric analysis and reference point methods, to evaluate workers’ satisfaction and students’ achievement, respectively. Nevertheless, to the best of our knowledge, we are the first to apply this combination of econometric and GP techniques, together with the use of scenarios and under a robust environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To alleviate these drawbacks, a methodological approach to generate possibly efficient solutions was proposed in [37]. Based on the use of an achievement scalarizing function [38], this approach combines the ideas of interval multiobjective programming suggested in [30] with a reference point-based approach [39]. This section of the paper represents a continuation of the work in [37].…”
Section: Interval Multiobjective Linear Programming: a Novel Approach To Obtain Possibly Efficient Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the PISA survey, which is taken among students in 60 countries coordinated by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD, 2010), is intended to measure the outcome of compulsory education. Other leading standardized scores include school examination results (Conti-Ramsden et al, 2009), the development of personal and social skills in the UK (Authority, 1996), the WA curriculum in the Australian compulsory education sector (Berlach & McNaught, 2007), teacher-based scores in Europe (Luque et al, 2015) and the academic scores of the students and the rankings of the schools, both of which highlight the urban-rural gap (Zhao, 2009) in China.…”
Section: Theoretical Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%