2000
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1521-3994(200012)321:5/6<373::aid-asna373>3.0.co;2-t
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the possibility of outbursts of comets under the influence of the electrostatic destruction of cometary grains

Abstract: It was examined whether the electrostatic destruction of grains could explain variations and outbursts of comets brightness. It was shown that this destructive mechanism could lead to the jump of the comet brightness at large heliocentric distances for a more than one stellar magnitude.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(6) and (8)), but for the same dispersion and average value of the radius and for different assumed shapes of secondary particles (normal function, logarythmic normal function), but for the same dispersion and the average value of radius of the secondary particles are small (in numerical calculations it was assumed that the standard deviation of the function is equal to the average value of ). Analogous result has been already shown (Gronkowski 2000). That is why the tables present only the results for the first assumed distribution function of primary particles and for the assumed normal function of daughter particles.…”
Section: The Influence Of the Strong Solar Wind On The Comet As A Possupporting
confidence: 71%
“…(6) and (8)), but for the same dispersion and average value of the radius and for different assumed shapes of secondary particles (normal function, logarythmic normal function), but for the same dispersion and the average value of radius of the secondary particles are small (in numerical calculations it was assumed that the standard deviation of the function is equal to the average value of ). Analogous result has been already shown (Gronkowski 2000). That is why the tables present only the results for the first assumed distribution function of primary particles and for the assumed normal function of daughter particles.…”
Section: The Influence Of the Strong Solar Wind On The Comet As A Possupporting
confidence: 71%