1960
DOI: 10.1063/1.1735647
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Possibility of Maser Action in Nuclear Quadrupole Systems

Abstract: Articles you may be interested inA novel power amplification scheme for nuclear magnetic resonance/nuclear quadrupole resonance systems Rev. Sci. Instrum. 82, 034707 (2011);

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1960
1960
1961
1961

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The circulator is a vital component in the reflection-type cavity maser, and one paper discussing this topic has appeared In addition, proposals have been made for a circul atorless amplifier using two balanced maser cavities and a magic tee, and for nonreciprocal cavity masers without circulators usin~ the nonreciprocal nature of the maser interactIOn process itself [Aram and Krayer , 1958;Autler, 1958 ;Strandberg and K yhl] . Proposals have also been made for radiofrequency masers using nuclear spin levels, although the numerical calculations are not encouraging, particularly at Imver frequ encies [Braunstein, 1957;Donovan and Vuylsteke, 1960].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The circulator is a vital component in the reflection-type cavity maser, and one paper discussing this topic has appeared In addition, proposals have been made for a circul atorless amplifier using two balanced maser cavities and a magic tee, and for nonreciprocal cavity masers without circulators usin~ the nonreciprocal nature of the maser interactIOn process itself [Aram and Krayer , 1958;Autler, 1958 ;Strandberg and K yhl] . Proposals have also been made for radiofrequency masers using nuclear spin levels, although the numerical calculations are not encouraging, particularly at Imver frequ encies [Braunstein, 1957;Donovan and Vuylsteke, 1960].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%