1999
DOI: 10.1080/00150199908016431
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the possibility of ferromagnetic, antiferromagnetic, ferroelectric, and ferroelastic domain reorientations in magnetic and electric fields

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
41
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This reduces the probable outcomes to either state 4 ͑in which both D and M reverse͒ or state 8 ͑in which D and M are unchanged͒. Of these, state 8, in which the magnetic ordering is unchanged compared to state 1, is the most likely, since the reversal of the oxygen rotations is energetically costly, and is not required by the reversal of P. It is clear, however, that the earlier argument 8,9 that the mutual invariance under timeand space inversion of electric field and magnetization inhibits the possibility of electric-field-induced magnetization reversal, does not hold. While it is certainly correct that it is not possible to drive the system from state 1 to its timeconjugate state 1Ј using an electric field, the state corresponding to 1Ј is also present in most ferroelectric ferromag- …”
mentioning
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This reduces the probable outcomes to either state 4 ͑in which both D and M reverse͒ or state 8 ͑in which D and M are unchanged͒. Of these, state 8, in which the magnetic ordering is unchanged compared to state 1, is the most likely, since the reversal of the oxygen rotations is energetically costly, and is not required by the reversal of P. It is clear, however, that the earlier argument 8,9 that the mutual invariance under timeand space inversion of electric field and magnetization inhibits the possibility of electric-field-induced magnetization reversal, does not hold. While it is certainly correct that it is not possible to drive the system from state 1 to its timeconjugate state 1Ј using an electric field, the state corresponding to 1Ј is also present in most ferroelectric ferromag- …”
mentioning
confidence: 65%
“…4 Conversely, early work on nickel-iodine boracite 7 showed that, below ϳ60 K, reversal of the spontaneous electric polarization rotates the magnetization by 90°, indicating that the axis of the magnetization, but not its sense, can be controlled by an electric field. In fact, it was believed 8,9 that electric-field-induced 180°switching of the magnetization should be impossible, because a reversal of the magnetization corresponds to the operation of time inversion, whereas the electric field is invariant under this operation. In this work we show that such behavior is not generally impossible by using multiferroic bismuth ferrite, BiFeO 3 , as a test case to analyze the coupling between magnetism and ferroelectricity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• and 109 • ) occur, as shown in figure 1b,c (marked as a different colour of the antiferromagnetic plane from the original one) [9,[13][14][15]. On the other hand, 180…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a unique property makes these systems extremely useful for many technological applications ranging from tunable multifunctional spintronics to magnetoelectric random access memory devices and many kinds of optoelectronic devices. 1,2 Physically, as pointed out by Aizu 3 and later on by other authors, 4,5 the ME coupling between magnetism and ferroelectricity is governed by a simultaneous breaking of inversion and time-reversal symmetries. Since its first prediction, 3 the search for multiferroic materials 6,7 has become one of the most active research areas in condensed matter and material physics.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%