1993
DOI: 10.1007/bf01231698
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the poles of regular differentials of singular curves

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [29], the second author introduced a zeta function Z(Ca(X), T ) associated to the effective Cartier divisors on X. Other types of zeta functions associated to singular curves over finite fields were introduced in [15], [16], [23], [24], and [30]. The zeta function Z(Ca(X), T ) admits an Euler product with nontrivial factors at the singular points of X.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [29], the second author introduced a zeta function Z(Ca(X), T ) associated to the effective Cartier divisors on X. Other types of zeta functions associated to singular curves over finite fields were introduced in [15], [16], [23], [24], and [30]. The zeta function Z(Ca(X), T ) admits an Euler product with nontrivial factors at the singular points of X.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…which has been shown in [8], Proposition 2.2 under the assumption that the constant field is infinite. Until now, in this section we did not make any assumption on the constant field.…”
Section: Corollary 42 the Sum And The Product Of Dim(b·mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The Examples 4 and 5 are not linearly normal. In [3], p. 244, there are two descriptions of the canonical defect D, the one due to Grothendieck (see [1]) and the one due to Rosenlicht ([11], IV.9); for Rosenlicht 's description, see [12], §2). The following examples may be checked using [12], §2.…”
Section: Proof Of Propositionmentioning
confidence: 99%