1982
DOI: 10.1016/0378-4363(82)90025-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the pinning of magnetic domain walls by lattice defects in Ni and Ni-alloys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4) seemed to be the outcome of two mechanisms having opposite effects on x,,, and H,,, namely, the release of vacancies from impurity traps formed during quenching and their subsequent agglomeration at deeper traps in complex aggregates or microscopic voids at higher annealing temperatures [ 181. The latter process seemed to impose a heavily pinning action on the magnetic domain walls, preventing them from normal detachment from fixation points and leak out the magnetic pressure exerted by the magnetic field on domain walls [7]. This effect tends to decrease the maximum magnetic susceptibility (x,,,) while increasing the magnetic coercivity (Her), which was actually observed in this stage (see Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…4) seemed to be the outcome of two mechanisms having opposite effects on x,,, and H,,, namely, the release of vacancies from impurity traps formed during quenching and their subsequent agglomeration at deeper traps in complex aggregates or microscopic voids at higher annealing temperatures [ 181. The latter process seemed to impose a heavily pinning action on the magnetic domain walls, preventing them from normal detachment from fixation points and leak out the magnetic pressure exerted by the magnetic field on domain walls [7]. This effect tends to decrease the maximum magnetic susceptibility (x,,,) while increasing the magnetic coercivity (Her), which was actually observed in this stage (see Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Comparison of the experimental and calculated values of the parameter p is usually considered as a practical numerical test for the validity of the model used by Neel. However, the experimental values of this parameter, measured till now for numerous monoand poly-crystalline soft and hard magnets, are much larger than those expected from Néel's theory (see, e.g., [4][5][6]). For example, in the experiment performed by Porteseil [4] on Fe-Si single crystal rectangular frames, each containing a single active Bloch wall, the value of the parameter p was obtained as 260 which is more than two orders of magnitude larger than the expected value of 1.6.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%