On the physical nature of accretion disc viscosity

Abstract

We use well-established observational evidence to draw conclusions about the fundamental nature of the viscosity in accretion discs. To do this, we first summarise the observational evidence for the value of the dimensionless accretion disc viscosity parameter α, defined by Shakura & Sunyaev (1973, 1976. We find that, for fully ionized discs, the value of α is readily amenable to reliable estimation and that the observations are consistent with the hypothesis that α ∼ 0.2 − 0.3. In contrast in discs that are not fully ionized, estimates of the value of α are generally less direct and the values obtained are generally < 0.01 and often ≪ 0.01. We conclude that this gives us crucial information about the nature of viscosity in accretion discs. First, in fully ionized discs the strength of the turbulence is always limited by being at most trans-sonic. This implies that it is necessary that credible models of the turbulence reflect this fact. Second, the smaller values of α found for less ionized, and therefore less strongly conducting, discs imply that magnetism plays a dominant role. This provides important observational support for the concept of magneto-rotational instability (MRI) driven hydromagnetic turbulence.

A review of the disc instability model for dwarf novae, soft X-ray transients and related objects

“…The determination of during quiescence is based on the recurrence time of outbursts and is somewhat more uncertain, although must clearly be smaller in quiescence than during outbursts. Martin et al (2019) considered other systems (X-ray binaries, Be stars, FU Ori and protostellar discs) and came to a similar conclusion.…”

Inflation of migrated hot Jupiters

“…The estimated α ν values are broadly distributed between orders of magnitude (1e−4 to 1e−2) and there is not yet a correlation found with global properties of the disk or star (Rafikov 2017;Ansdell et al 2018). The value does seem correlated with the disk's rate of ionization, which implies that α ν is not a constant but changes during the evolution of the disk (Martin et al 2019). This would induce an extra time variability in the accretion speed of equation 5.…”

Extreme variability in an active galactic nucleus: Gaia16aax

“…Here α is the usual viscosity parameter, and we have adopted the observed value of α ≈ 0.3 for fully ionised disks (Martin et al 2019;King et al 2007), κ is the opacity, κ T the electron scattering opacity, M the black hole mass, and m = 0.1 Mc 2 /L Edd is the dimensionless accretion rate, where m = 1 gives a luminosity at the Eddington limit, L Edd for an assumed radiative efficiency of = 0.1.…”